Fiorentina vs Crystal Palace Tips and Predictions O/U Apoorv

UEFA Conference League

Analysis More Tips

Fiorentina

Crystal Palace

Further Reading

NoteGoals Won 6/10

We offer a fantastic range of football tips, all of which can be found right here: We post our football tips now to get the best odds before the match starts. Make sure you check and place your bets now to get the most profit from our tips. ꜰᴏʟʟᴏᴡ ᴜꜱ ᴏɴ ɴᴏᴡɢᴏᴀʟ❗️

AH
UEFA ECL Fiorentina - Crystal Palace

68
Loyal08

Fiorentina VS Crystal Palace I'm a seasoned professional in football analysis, offering long - term high - quality insights. In recent matches, the offensive conversion rate of Florence in the last 6 games is 28%, which is lower than Crystal Palace's 35%. The xG efficiency of Florence is 1.2, while that of Crystal Palace is 1.8, indicating that the away team has a stronger finishing ability. The key passing success rate of the home team, Florence, is 42%, better than Crystal Palace's 38%. However, the value index of forward passes of Florence is 0.72, lower than the away team's 1.05. Florence has an advantage in midfield ball - possession rate, reaching 58%. But its conversion speed is only 0.3 seconds per time, slower than Crystal Palace's 0.25 seconds per time. The away team, Crystal Palace, runs 112 km throughout the game, 4% more than the home team. The number of high - intensity sprints of Crystal Palace is 38, leading by 12 times. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - tim

AH
UEFA ECL Fiorentina - Crystal Palace
Uefa Champions

*Fiorentina vs Crystal Palace - UEFA Conference League QF Analysis* Second leg: _Thursday, 16 Apr 2026, 21:00 CET / 12:00 PDT at Stadio Artemio Franchi, Florence_ Aggregate: _Crystal Palace lead 3-0 after the first leg at Selhurst Park_ *1. First leg recap - 9 Apr 2026 at Selhurst Park* Palace dominated 3-0 and have one foot in their first-ever European semi-final. *Goals:* 1-0: Jean-Philippe Mateta 24' pen - sent David De Gea the wrong way after Dodo fouled Evann Guessand 2-0: Tyrick Mitchell 31' - tapped in rebound after De Gea saved Mateta’s close-range effort 3-0: Ismaïla Sarr 90' - downwards header from Daichi Kamada cross 80de84a1 *Key match moments:* - Palace: 6 clean sheets in 11 UECL games this season - Fiorentina hit woodwork via Giovanni Fabbian 51' and Dean Henderson made 2 saves - Dodo picked up a yellow and is suspended for leg 2 - Mateta, starting for first time since 25 Jan, was MOTM 03c444100a8fce21 *2. Route to the quarter-finals* *Crystal Palac

1x2
UEFA ECL Fiorentina - Crystal Palace

2

More Tips

Al-Sadd VS Vissel Kobe Sadd has a better offensive performance this season. Their average offensive conversion rate is 18.3%, higher than Kobe Victory Ship's 14.7%. Also, their xG efficiency value is 1.21 per attack, leading over Kobe's 0.98. In terms of key pass success rate, Sadd's accuracy is 82%, with a front - field passing value of 0.34, while Kobe's is only 0.27. This gives Sadd a significant threat. Sadd has a much higher number of high - intensity sprints, averaging 13.2 times per game compared to Kobe's 9.8. With a 58% midfield ball - possession rate, they can achieve rapid offensive and defensive transitions. In their recent head - to - head encounters, Sadd created 4 excellent goal - scoring opportunities through high - pressing tactics and converted 2 goals, demonstrating their efficient finishing ability. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Sadd shows strong defensive capabilities, averaging 14.6 tackles per game compared

O/U
ACLE Al-Sadd - Vissel Kobe
AZ Alkmaar VS FC Shakhtar Donetsk Alkmaar has recently demonstrated high - efficiency conversion ability in the offensive end. Their average shot - on - target conversion rate reaches 18.5%, which is higher than the league average of 14.2%. The success rate of key passes is 67%, and the success rate of breakthroughs on the left side is as high as 83%. On the other hand, although Shakhtar Donetsk has a top - level xG efficiency in Europe (0.92/xG), its actual goal conversion rate is only 0.78, indicating obvious waste of opportunities. The front - court passing value indices of the two teams are 1.23 and 1.41 respectively, which shows that Shakhtar Donetsk prefers through - ball attacks. Alkmaar has a prominent midfield control. They complete 27 successful long passes per game on average, and the transition speed is 4.8m/s, 0.3m/s faster than that of Shakhtar Donetsk. Visit latest domain Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming Alkmaar shows strong performance

O/U
UEFA ECL AZ Alkmaar - FC Shakhtar Donetsk
Celta Vigo VS SC Freiburg In this Europa League encounter, the performance differences between Celta Vigo and Freiburg are quite evident. Celta Vigo has a relatively low offensive conversion rate at home in European competitions this season. Their average offensive conversion rate per game is only 9.8%, which is significantly lower than Freiburg's 13.2%. In terms of key passes in the front - field, Freiburg also has an edge. Their success rate of key passes in the front - field reaches 82%, while Celta Vigo's is only 75%. Moreover, Freiburg's xG efficiency is 1.83 per 90 minutes, 0.31 higher than Celta Vigo's. Freiburg's midfield control is outstanding. They can regain the ball 42.7 times per game on average and have a front - field passing success rate of 85.4%. In contrast, Celta Vigo makes 12.3 turnovers per game. In terms of physical performance, Freiburg's overall running distance per game is 112 km, and their high - intensity sprints (158 times) are 19% more than Celta Vigo's. Vi

AH
UEFA EL Celta Vigo - SC Freiburg

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Fiorentina VS Crystal Palace