APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> BET ENSURED>

    Union Touarga Sport Rabat VS DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi

    Botola Pro 1
    Analysis More Tips
    Union Touarga Sport Rabat
    Union Touarga Sport Rabat 0
    0 DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi
    DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi
    Further Reading
    • freekbass
      freekbass
      Union Touarga Sport Rabat VS DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi FUS Rabat has been in decent form recently, with an average offensive conversion rate of 12.3%, outperforming DHJ Hassania's 9.8%. However, their xG efficiency averages are 1.4 and 1.1 respectively, indicating inefficiencies in the attacking departments of both teams. FUS Rabat holds an edge in key passing success rate, at 76% compared to DHJ Hassania's 68%. The passing value in the attacking third (PA.V) of 1.83 for FUS Rabat against 1.52 for DHJ Hassania shows more precise offensive organization. In terms of midfield control, FUS Rabat has a 58% control rate and an average of 2.1 counter - attacks per minute, while DHJ Hassania has 52% and 1.8 respectively, giving FUS Rabat tactical initiative. The average running distances of the two teams are 108km and 105km, and the high - intensity sprint data of 213 times and 198 times show only a small gap. Overall, FUS Rabat seems to have more advantages in various aspects of the game. Visi
      AH
      MAR D1 Union Touarga Sport Rabat 0-0 DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi
    • Tobi Sage
      Tobi Sage
      Union Touarga Sport Rabat VS DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi FUS Rabat and DHJ Hassania have had several encounters. In one match, FUS Rabat won 1-0. Another ended in a 0-0 draw. And in a game, DHJ Hassania lost 1-2 to Royal Armed Forces of Rabat. Looking at their recent form, in the last ten meetings, the home team has a win rate of 50.0%, indicating that the two sides are evenly - matched in terms of strength. The away team's offensive efficiency stands at 88.8%, which might suggest they are over - performing. The home team averages 1.1 goals per game and concedes 1.2 goals, while the away team averages 0.9 goals and concedes 1.0 goal. One notable aspect is that the away team has a lack of firepower in the front line. This could potentially be a deciding factor in the upcoming game. Visit Nowgoal.net to get real - time livescore & live football streaming FUS Rabat and DHJ Hassania have had close encounters in previous matches. In their past meetings, the home team (DHJ Hassania) has a winni
      AH
      MAR D1 Union Touarga Sport Rabat 0-0 DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi
    • Liam 665
      Liam 665 Won 9/15
      Union Touarga Sport Rabat VS DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi FUS Rabat has been in a relatively good state recently. Their average offensive conversion rate is 12.3%, better than DHJ Hassania's 9.8%. However, both teams have issues with offensive efficiency, as their xG efficiency averages are 1.4 and 1.1 respectively. In terms of passing, FUS Rabat has a key passing success rate of 76%, which is higher than DHJ Hassania's 68%. The passing value in the front - field (PA.V) of 1.83 for FUS Rabat compared to 1.52 for DHJ Hassania shows that FUS Rabat has a more precise offensive organization. Tactically, FUS Rabat has a midfield control rate of 58% and an average of 2.1 counter - attacks per minute. In contrast, DHJ Hassania has a 52% midfield control rate and 1.8 counter - attacks per minute, indicating that FUS Rabat has more tactical initiative. As for physical performance, the average running distance of the two teams is 108km for FUS Rabat and 105km for DHJ Hassania. The high - intensity s
      AH
      MAR D1 Union Touarga Sport Rabat 0-0 DHJ Difaa Hassani Jadidi
    More Tips
    • KuPS Stats In the last games, KuPS has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 50%, while their draw rate stands at 40%. On the other hand, they lost 10% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 40% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 10% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, KuPS scores 1 goals per game and concedes 1 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 40% of the games, and the team scored in 80% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 20% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 50% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 20% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 30%, and losing with BTTS in 0%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 10% of the games, 1 goal in 10% of the games, 2 goals in 50% of the games, 3 goals in 20% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 10% of the games. VPS Stats In their recent games, VPS has demonstrated varied performance levels. Their win rate
      1x2
      FIN CUP KuPs - Vaasa VPS
    • Ilves Stats In the last games, Ilves has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 40%, while their draw rate stands at 30%. On the other hand, they lost 30% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 20% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 30% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, Ilves scores 2 goals per game and concedes 2 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 40% of the games, and the team scored in 90% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 40% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 50% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 0% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 30%, and losing with BTTS in 20%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 0% of the games, 1 goal in 20% of the games, 2 goals in 20% of the games, 3 goals in 0% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 60% of the games. Lahti Stats In their recent games, Lahti has demonstrated varied performance levels. Their win
      O/U
      FIN CUP Ilves Tampere - Lahti
    • SJK Stats In the last games, SJK has shown diverse performance statistics. They have a win rate of 30%, while their draw rate stands at 30%. On the other hand, they lost 40% of the games. Interesting aspects include a 30% rate of winning with over 1.5 goals scored and a 30% rate of losing while conceding over 1.5 goals. On average, SJK scores 2 goals per game and concedes 1 goals per game. Their clean sheet rate is 30% of the games, and the team scored in 70% of the games. Goals were scored in both halves in 40% of the games, and both teams scored (BTTS) in 50% of the matches. The combination of winning and BTTS occurred in 10% of the games, while a draw with BTTS was seen in 20%, and losing with BTTS in 20%. The match total goals were 0 goals in 10% of the games, 1 goal in 10% of the games, 2 goals in 30% of the games, 3 goals in 10% of the games, and 4 or more goals in 40% of the games. Inter Turku Stats In their recent games, Inter Turku has demonstrated varied performance levels. T
      1x2
      FIN CUP SJK Seinajoen - Inter Turku
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.