APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Okiem Madridisty>

    Netherlands VS Sweden

    FIFA World Cup
    Analysis More Tips
    Netherlands
    Netherlands 4
    1 Sweden
    Sweden
    Further Reading
    • kolkatatheke
      kolkatatheke Won 7/8
      Netherlands VS Sweden The Netherlands, ranked eighth in the world and with years of experience in European football, had a disappointing start in the group stage. Despite leading twice in the first round, they failed to hold on to the lead, resulting in an unfavorable start in terms of points. The Dutch team shows a high level of coordination in attack and defense at home, scoring an average of 2.8 goals per game and conceding only 0.7 goals. However, they face some personnel issues. Tin Bergh has a concussion and will miss the game. Depay is on the bench, and Simmons and Schouten are still injured and unable to play. Sweden, ranked 34th in the world, is a mid - level powerhouse in Europe. They got the points in the first round, starting the group stage smoothly. But when playing away, their form fluctuates, and there is a lack of balance in both attack and defense. They score an average of 1.7 goals per game and concede 1.6 goals. The core strikers of the Swedish team are all fit and
      AH
      World Cup Netherlands 4-1 Sweden
    • p90x
      p90x
      Netherlands VS Sweden The Netherlands has demonstrated remarkable offensive dominance this season, boasting a win - rate of 60% and an average of 2.29 goals per game, far exceeding Sweden's 1.6 goals. At home, the Dutch team has a stable win - rate of 57.1% and concedes only 0.9 goals per game on average, showing excellent balance in both attack and defense. In contrast, Sweden struggles on the road. Their away win - rate is a mere 25%, and they concede 2.38 goals per game, revealing significant defensive weaknesses. When comparing the statistics of the two teams, the Netherlands has a goal - difference advantage of 14, while Sweden's goal - difference is - 3, clearly indicating the disparity in attack and defense. The Netherlands also has an edge in corner kicks, averaging 5.7 per game, nearly 1.6 more than Sweden's 4.09. This shows their stronger threat on the flanks and better control of the game. Sweden, on the other hand, receives an average of 1.5 yellow cards per game, suggestin
      AH
      World Cup Netherlands 4-1 Sweden
    • Gollll
      Gollll Won 4/5
      Netherlands VS Sweden The encounters between the Netherlands and Sweden have always been a showcase of tactical battles and historical legacies in European football. Looking back at their last five official meetings, the Netherlands has shown a near - dominant edge at home. In the 2017 European Qualifiers, the Netherlands thrashed Sweden 2 - 0 at home, sealing the victory by half - time. Despite having one less corner, the contrast between their offensive efficiency and defensive intensity was evident. In the 2010 European Championship, the Netherlands routed Sweden 4 - 1 at home, demonstrating their tactical execution in crucial games. In a 2008 friendly, the Netherlands maintained their home unbeaten record with a 3 - 1 win, highlighting the stability of their offensive and defensive systems. In these three home victories, the Netherlands averaged 2.3 goals per game and conceded only 0.7 goals, with meticulous details in both attack and defense being the key to success. On the other
      AH
      World Cup Netherlands 4-1 Sweden
    More Tips
    • Almeria VS Malaga Almería has an average offensive conversion rate of 12.3% this season, lower than Málaga's 14.1%. However, the xG values of 1.23 for Almería and 1.51 for Málaga suggest that Málaga's offensive efficiency is inflated. In terms of key pass success rate, the home - team Almería at 82% is better than the away - team Málaga at 75%. The passing value in the front - field, 0.33 for Almería compared to 0.28 for Málaga, shows a more efficient organization from Almería. Almería has a crushing advantage in midfield control, with 58.4% against Málaga's 41.6%. This allows Almería to complete each offensive transition in only 11.3 seconds on average, 2.1 seconds faster than Málaga. The average running distances of the two teams are not significantly different, 112 km for Almería and 109 km for Málaga. But Almería has 193 high - intensity sprints, significantly more than Málaga's 167. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streamin
      O/U
      SPA D2 Almeria - Malaga
    • Germany VS Ivory Coast Germany holds a significant edge in offensive conversion rate (18.3% vs 12.1%) and xG efficiency (1.82 vs 1.24), indicating that its forwards are more capable of seizing opportunities. In terms of passing, Germany boasts a remarkable 76% success rate for key passes and a front - court passing value (PTV) of 0.43, demonstrating its precise offensive organization. On the other hand, Ivory Coast has a weak midfield control. It loses the ball 2.3 more times per game (14.7 times) than Germany, and its offensive transition speed (2.1 seconds per transition) is slower compared to Germany's 1.6 seconds per transition. In terms of physical performance, Germany outshines Ivory Coast with a total team running distance of 112 km and 235 high - intensity sprints. I believe that with such comprehensive advantages, Germany has a strong chance of winning this match. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Germany's midfield player Schne
      AH
      World Cup Germany - Ivory Coast
    • Vila Nova VS Nautico (PE) In this Brazilian Serie B encounter, Villanova shows significant advantages over Náutico. Villanova has a better offensive conversion rate this season, with an average of 12.3%, compared to Náutico's 9.8%. In terms of key pass success rate, Villanova leads with 72.4%, while Náutico has 68.1%. The value of forward passes for Villanova is 1.83 times per 10 minutes, which is better than Náutico's 1.56 times. The midfield control rate of Villanova is 58.7%, and its counter - attack speed is 1.2 seconds per time, 0.3 seconds faster than Náutico. Moreover, Villanova's average running distance per game is over 112 km with 213 high - intensity sprints, both of which are better than Náutico's 107 km and 189 sprints. I believe that only by making careful recommendations can we achieve long - term development. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Villanova has a strong defensive performance, with an average of 14.6 tack
      O/U
      BRA D2 Vila Nova - Nautico (PE)
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.