APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Boris MoscosoWon 8/8Follow90.9%Win Rate +59%ROI 12Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
FurkanHolseWon 8/9Follow82.6%Win Rate +58.2%ROI 27Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
3
MTASHEWon 15/15Follow80%Win Rate +40.7%ROI 33Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
4
Garis TengahWon 8/10Follow80%Win Rate +27.7%ROI 11Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
5
KhoishtFollow77.8%Win Rate +60.2%ROI 11Tips 2.03Avg Odds -
6
ValouzzWon 5/6Follow76.9%Win Rate +44.7%ROI 29Tips 1.92Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
OC TIPSTERIn the World Cup, a match with a distinct contrast in attack and defense is on the horizon. The disparity in data between New Zealand and Belgium will be a key point of interest. New Zealand has been struggling on the offensive end recently. They average only 0.9 goals per game. With a total of 9 goals and 19 goals conceded, their goal difference of -10 reflects a significant imbalance between attack and defense. On the other hand, Belgium presents a stark contrast. Their offensive firepower is impressive, averaging 2.6 goals per game, while their defense is solid, conceding only 7 goals in total. Their efficiency in both attack and defense far surpasses that of New Zealand. The difference in key statistics is particularly notable. Belgium averages 7.7 corner kicks per game, compared to New Zealand's 4. This highlights the difference in the struggle for initiative during the transition between attack and defense. Belgium's defensive system shows high discipline, with an average of onlyO/U
World Cup
New Zealand
0-3
Belgium
-
Koke ResurrecciónIn this World Cup encounter, the disparity in data between New Zealand and Belgium will be a major point of interest. New Zealand has been struggling on the offensive front. They have a weak attack, averaging only 0.9 goals per game. With a total of 9 goals scored but 19 conceded, their goal difference of -10 clearly shows an imbalance between offense and defense. On the other hand, Belgium presents a stark contrast. They have a powerful attack, averaging 2.6 goals per game, and a solid defense, having conceded only 7 goals. Their offensive and defensive efficiency far surpasses that of New Zealand. The difference in key data is quite remarkable. Belgium averages 7.7 corner - kicks per game, while New Zealand only gets 4. This indicates a significant difference in the fight for initiative during attack - defense transitions. Belgium's defense is highly disciplined, with an average of only 1.4 yellow cards per game. In contrast, New Zealand has defensive flaws, conceding an average of 1O/UWorld Cup
New Zealand
0-3
Belgium
-
CR7 FAN Won 3/4⚽🔥 Match Analysis: Belgium vs New Zealand 🔥⚽ ⚽🇧🇪 Belgium ⭐ Strengths Clearly superior player quality in every position. Variety in attack, including passing, attacks down the flanks, and long-range shots. Strong midfield, good control of the game tempo. Effective set pieces and aerial duels. High level of international experience. ⚠️ Weaknesses Defense may have moments of lapses in concentration when pushing high. If there is rotation in several positions, the effectiveness of the attack may be slightly reduced. ⚽🇳🇿 New Zealand ⭐ Strengths Physically strong and good in aerial duels. Disciplined and team-oriented defense. Determined and runs throughout the game. Set pieces are a key weapon. ⚠️ Weaknesses Overall player quality is inferior to Belgium. Limitations in attacking creativity. Often at a disadvantage against teams that press and hold the ball well.AHWorld Cup
New Zealand
0-3
Belgium
68
World Cup
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X