APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
MTASHEWon 15/15Follow90%Win Rate +59.1%ROI 22Tips 1.80Avg Odds -
2
Boris MoscosoWon 14/16Follow87.5%Win Rate +52%ROI 17Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
3
Tyson I Malik - Go Bears ForeverFollow80%Win Rate +23.4%ROI 15Tips 1.79Avg Odds -
4
Games_ Under_OverFollow80%Win Rate +50.6%ROI 12Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
5
FurkanHolseWon 11/14Follow79.2%Win Rate +48.2%ROI 28Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
6
werzarn.Won 6/6Follow76.5%Win Rate +52.2%ROI 17Tips 1.93Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Jose CidTPS Turku's home tactics follow a 4-2-3-1 possession and pressing system. The logic behind their play is as follows: The double defensive midfielders maintain ball control steadily. The full - backs on both flanks continuously push forward, stretching the opponent's incomplete full - back lines. The attacking midfielder inserts into the flanks to create shooting opportunities. Relying on the home - field advantage, they continuously put pressure on and wear down the opponent. They are good at establishing a score advantage in the first half and then retracting to control the game and secure the victory. The key to restricting their opponents lies in the fact that Yaro's right - wing main winger is out due to injury. As a result, they have to use substitutes for the full - back position, and their flanks are constantly penetrated by TPS, creating gaps. Yaro also lacks a key intercepting player in the midfield, leading to a complete loss of control in the middle of the pitch. This allowsAH
FIN D1
TPS Turku
3-2 Jaro
-
Max Statman | 𝐽𝑢𝑣𝑒.In the Finnish Premier League, a significant match is on the horizon. The data comparison between the home team TPS Turku and the away team Järvenpää reveals a distinct difference in offense and defense. The home team has an outstanding home - field record this season. With a 75% win rate at home, they score 1.5 goals per game on average while conceding only 2 goals. A positive goal difference of +4 shows their strong defensive resilience at home. On the contrary, Järvenpää has a dismal away record. They have a 100% loss rate, conceding 22 goals. They can only score 0.66 goals per game on average, and a goal difference of - 18 exposes the fatal flaws in their defensive system. Looking at specific offensive and defensive indicators, TPS Turku averages 3.8 corner kicks and 2.1 yellow cards per game, indicating both good ball - control ability and discipline. Järvenpää, on the other hand, averages 4.5 corner kicks away from home, but this can't cover up their defensive collapse.AHFIN D1
TPS Turku
3-2 Jaro
-
Xavier83PK-35 Helsinki boasts an outstanding home record, having maintained a winning streak in recent home games. The players on the team have a high level of understanding and coordination. In contrast, MP Mikaeli has an inconsistent performance away from home, and their defense lacks stability. Looking at the historical head - to - head records, the home team, PK-35 Helsinki, holds an edge. Given PK-35 Helsinki's strong home form and their historical advantage, they are likely to continue their dominant performance at home in this match. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming PK-35 Hämeenlinna holds a home - field advantage. They typically adopt a 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 formation to build a complete offensive and defensive system. The team has a strong midfield. Two defensive midfielders are responsible for interception, sweeping, and ball - distribution in the backcourt. They form a horizontal defensive barrier to cut off the opponent's central penetratiO/UFIN D1
TPS Turku
3-2 Jaro
FIN D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X