APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
RinoandiFollow83.3%Win Rate +59.5%ROI 12Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
2
IqtidarFollow82.4%Win Rate +38.1%ROI 19Tips 1.83Avg Odds -
3
Rocco LambertiFollow81.8%Win Rate +42.7%ROI 35Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
4
Reece MccallumWon 17/20Follow80.6%Win Rate +38.4%ROI 32Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
5
Imad masiFollow80%Win Rate +47.8%ROI 15Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
6
JesseJT 🔴⚪Follow80%Win Rate +42.5%ROI 11Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Brandon MitchellThe two sides show distinct differences in offensive efficiency. San Jose has a low offensive conversion rate of only 12%. However, their xG efficiency stands at 1.8 per 90 minutes, higher than Kansas' 1.3 per 90 minutes. In terms of key pass success rate, San Jose's 82% outperforms Kansas' 75%. The value of their forward passes, 0.35 per pass, is also more threatening. Regarding the midfield control, San Jose boasts an average ball - possession rate of 58%. Their transition attack speed is only 12 times per game, significantly slowing down the pace of the match. Both teams cover a running distance of over 110 kilometers. But the difference in high - intensity sprints (47 for San Jose and 42 for Kansas) is not significant. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming In this match, there is a clear difference in offensive efficiency between San Jose Earthquakes Reserves and Kansas City Wizards Reserves. San Jose's offensive conversion rate is onlyAH
MLS Next PL
San Jose Earthquakes Reserve
6-1 Sporting Kansas City(R)
-
Janan💚Based on the recent data, Kansas City Sporting Reserve holds a slight edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 11.2%, compared to San Jose Earthquakes Reserve's 9.8%. Moreover, their expected goals efficiency (xG/attacking end) is 0.13, higher than San Jose's 0.11. In terms of passing efficiency, Kansas City's key pass success rate is 72%, and their passing value in the attacking third (PPDA index) is 9.8. These figures are better than San Jose's 68% and 10.5 respectively. Regarding midfield control and transition speed, Kansas City averages 4.3 counter - attacks within 5 seconds after a steal per game, while San Jose only manages 3.1. Also, Kansas City has a slightly higher average midfield possession rate of 52%. In terms of running distance, the entire Kansas City team averages 112.5 km per game, with a high - intensity sprint distance of 12.8 km. San Jose's figures are 110.1 km and 11.9 km respectively, indicating that Kansas City has an advantage inO/UMLS Next PL
San Jose Earthquakes Reserve
6-1 Sporting Kansas City(R)
-
Jack PellegriniLooking at recent statistics, Kansas City Reserve Team holds a slight edge in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 11.2%, compared to San Jose's 9.8%. Moreover, their expected goals per offensive action (xG/Offensive Action) is 0.13, higher than San Jose's 0.11. In terms of passing efficiency, Kansas City has a key - pass success rate of 72% and a Passes Allowed per Defensive Action (PPDA) index of 9.8. These figures are better than San Jose's 68% and 10.5 respectively. When it comes to midfield control and transition speed, Kansas City completes an average of 4.3 counter - attacks within 5 seconds after a steal per game, while San Jose only manages 3.1 times. Visit Nowgoal.net to watch World Cup 2026 livescore & free live football streaming Kansas shows a better performance compared to San Jose in several key aspects. In the expected goal efficiency (xG/attacking end), Kansas has a rate of 0.13, higher than San Jose's 0.11. In terms of passing efficiency, KaO/UMLS Next PL
San Jose Earthquakes Reserve
6-1 Sporting Kansas City(R)
MLS Next PL
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X