Chengdu Rongcheng FC vs Chongqing Tonglianglong Tips and Predictions AH richardᶜʳᶠ

Chinese Super League

Analysis More Tips

Chengdu Rongcheng FC

Chongqing Tonglianglong

Further Reading

Pi314

In recent matches, the offensive performance of Chengdu Rongcheng has been more efficient than that of Chongqing Tongliang Long. In terms of offensive conversion, Chengdu Rongcheng's offensive end has a conversion rate of 18.7% in the last five games, significantly higher than Chongqing Tongliang Long's 11.2%. The xG efficiency value stands at 1.32 for Chengdu Rongcheng compared to 0.89 for their opponents, indicating that Chengdu Rongcheng creates more high - quality goal - scoring opportunities. When it comes to passing, the key passing success rate of Chengdu Rongcheng is 74.3%, while Chongqing Tongliang Long only has 62.1%. The passing value index in the front - court is 31% higher for Chengdu Rongcheng. This means they can maintain a more fluid ball - control rhythm. In midfield, the ball - conduction speed of Chengdu Rongcheng is 5.2 times per minute, faster than Chongqing Tongliang Long's 4.1 times per minute, posing a greater threat in counter - attacks. In terms of physical pe

AH
CHA CSL Chengdu Rongcheng FC 1-1 Chongqing Tonglianglong
Henry Land

The recent head - to - head records between Chengdu Rongcheng and Chongqing Tongliang Long reveal a significant tactical disparity. In a previous Super League encounter, Chongqing Tongliang Long managed a 3 - 3 draw at home against Chengdu Rongcheng. At halftime, Chengdu Rongcheng led 2 - 0, but Chongqing Tongliang Long made a comeback in the second half. The corner - kick statistics tell a story: Chongqing Tongliang Long had eight fewer corner kicks at home, indicating their poor efficiency in the flanks' attack. They struggled to create effective threats through crosses and set - piece plays. In the Chinese Football Association Cup clash, the two teams drew 0 - 0 at Chongqing's home ground. The score remained 0 - 0 at halftime, and the corner - kick difference was - 5. This shows that Chongqing Tongliang Long still had a disadvantage in creating corner kicks. The consecutive corner - kick differences of - 8 and - 5 in these two matches highlight a systematic weakness in Chongqing Ton

O/U
CHA CSL Chengdu Rongcheng FC 1-1 Chongqing Tonglianglong
TopG Vikash

The head - to - head data between Chongqing Tonglianglong and Chengdu Rongcheng reveals distinct differences in tactical execution. In the Super League encounter, Chongqing Tonglianglong held Chengdu Rongcheng to a 3 - 3 draw at home. They managed to equalize after trailing 0 - 2 in the first half. However, they had eight fewer corner kicks, indicating inefficiency in converting attacks and vulnerability in defensive organization. In the Chinese Football Association Cup clash, the two teams played to a 0 - 0 draw, and Chongqing Tonglianglong again had five fewer corner kicks. Chengdu Rongcheng's consistent advantage in set - piece control was a crucial detail. The cumulative difference of 13 corner kicks in the two meetings clearly shows Chengdu Rongcheng's tactical superiority in controlling the game rhythm. The data also shows that Chongqing Tonglianglong has a potent attack, as they scored goals in both meetings. But their defense has significant problems. Falling behind by two goal

AH
CHA CSL Chengdu Rongcheng FC 1-1 Chongqing Tonglianglong

More Tips

Data reveals distinct offensive and defensive situations in the encounter between Örgryte and Häcken in the Swedish Super League. Örgryte has a dismal record at home this season. With a 0% win - rate, 50% draws, and 50% losses, they average only 1.5 goals per game while conceding 8 goals. The goal difference is - 2. Overall, their performance is even more lackluster. They average 0.8 goals per game, have conceded 31 goals in total, and their goal difference stands at - 23. Their offensive efficiency is extremely low, and there are frequent loopholes in their defensive system. On the other hand, Häcken shows clear advantages on the road. They have a 25% win - rate, 75% draws, and 0% losses away from home. They average 1.5 goals per game and concede 5 goals, with a goal difference of + 1. Overall, Häcken has a win - rate of 40%, a draw - rate of 40%, and a loss - rate of 20%. They average 1.9 goals per game, have conceded 20 goals, and their goal difference is only - 1. They maintai

O/U
SWE D1 Orgryte - Hacken
The head - to - head record between Valerenga and Tromsø in the Norwegian Premier League shows a distinct pattern of alternating wins and losses. In the last four official matches, each team has secured one win and one draw. In one encounter, Valerenga won 1 - 0 at home. The score was 0 - 0 at half - time, and the corner - kick difference was - 5. In the previous meeting, Tromsø triumphed 2 - 1 at home. Again, it was 0 - 0 at half - time, with a corner - kick difference of - 7. Looking deeper into historical data, in the four matches from 2022 to 2023, a 0 - 0 score at half - time occurred 100% of the time. The total number of goals was only 3.5, with an average of 0.9 goals per game. This highlights the common traits of both teams: a conservative tactical approach and low offensive efficiency. Data from friendly matches also support this view. Tromsø thrashed Valerenga 4 - 1 in one friendly. The score was 0 - 1 at half - time, and the corner - kick difference was - 8. Valerenga onc

AH
NOR D1 Tromso IL - Valerenga
Norway has shown a certain level of consistency in World Cup matches, with a win rate of up to 60%, while draws and losses each account for 20%. When playing at home, Norway's win rate drops to 50%, with draws and losses each at 25%. The number of goals scored and conceded is seven each, resulting in a goal difference of zero. The average number of goals per game is 1.75, indicating a relatively balanced attack and defense. On the other hand, England has demonstrated a stronger competitive edge. Their overall win rate is 70%, and they are particularly dominant away from home, with a 100% away - win rate. They average 2.33 goals per game and concede only 2 goals, with a goal difference of 5. The efficiency of their defense is their core strength. A comparison of the data shows that Norway has a total of 21 goals scored, 14 goals conceded, and a goal difference of 7, averaging 2.1 goals per game. England has 18 goals scored, 7 goals conceded, and a goal difference of 11, averaging 1.8 go

AH
World Cup Norway - England

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Chengdu Rongcheng FC VS Chongqing Tonglianglong