APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Stef Olivier K
289
Articles
0
Like
0
Follower
45.2%
Win Rate
-17.8%
ROI
35
Tips
1.89
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Logan WinchesterGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks stands at just 10%, and the xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better offensive state. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja leads with a 74% success rate of key passes, compared to Gomel's 64%. Their front - court passes contribute significantly to the game. In midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, which allows them to dominate the game rhythm. They have a faster transition speed, and their quick counter - attacks can put pressure on the opponent. Looking at the running data, Liepaja's whole team runs 110 km in a game and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. Their physical advantage enables them to maintain a full - game pressing strategy. Overall, Liepaja has more advantages in this match. Both Gomel and Liepaja have relatively low offensive efficiency this season, ranking at the lower end of theO/U
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
Smile KyelsGomel plays at home with a 4-3-3 high-pressing formation. Relying on the home atmosphere, they keep applying forward pressure. The double defensive midfielders solidify the middle for interception, cutting off the opponents' vertical passing lines from the backcourt. The full-backs frequently push forward to widen the offensive width. They combine inside cuts on the flanks with crosses from the byline for attacks. The tall players in the frontcourt compete for set-piece headers. Corners and free-kicks in the attacking third are their main scoring methods. After conceding a goal, Gomel quickly launches on-the-spot counter - attacks. The defense line stands relatively forward. When the full - backs push forward, there are gaps left behind for opponents to sprint through. The center - backs' speed in back - tracking and covering is insufficient. Gomel's long - term ball possession may lead to passing mistakes in the midfield. When facing a compact defense, their attacking rhythm slows dowO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
RMFranceGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks stands at only 10%, and the xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better situation. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja has a 74% success rate in key passes, outperforming Gomel's 64%. Their front - court passes contribute significantly to the game. In midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dominate the rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress their opponents with quick counter - attacks. Regarding running data, Liepaja's whole team runs a total of 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. Their physical strength advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Gomel plays at home with a 4-3-3 high-pressing formation. Relying on the home atmosphere, they keep applying forward pressure. The double defensive midfielders solidly intercept in thO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X