APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
343Follow90%Win Rate +53.2%ROI 10Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
Sedinho ⚽️Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.7%ROI 13Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
3
ApoorvWon 8/8Follow83.3%Win Rate +46.5%ROI 12Tips 1.85Avg Odds -
4
arpan paulFollow81.8%Win Rate +37.9%ROI 11Tips 1.82Avg Odds -
5
GideonJIlposFollow81.3%Win Rate +47%ROI 18Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
6
saidramadhanFollow77.8%Win Rate +35.7%ROI 29Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Logan WinchesterGomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate in finishing attacks stands at just 10%, and the xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better offensive state. They have a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja leads with a 74% success rate of key passes, compared to Gomel's 64%. Their front - court passes contribute significantly to the game. In midfield control, Liepaja holds a 44% ball - possession rate, which allows them to dominate the game rhythm. They have a faster transition speed, and their quick counter - attacks can put pressure on the opponent. Looking at the running data, Liepaja's whole team runs 110 km in a game and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. Their physical advantage enables them to maintain a full - game pressing strategy. Overall, Liepaja has more advantages in this match. Both Gomel and Liepaja have relatively low offensive efficiency this season, ranking at the lower end of theO/U
BLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
JoãoGomel takes advantage of their home - field advantage and deploys a 4 - 3 - 3 high - pressing formation. Relying on the enthusiastic home crowd, they keep applying forward pressure. The double defensive midfielders focus on the middle - field interception, cutting off the opponent's vertical passing lines from the backcourt. The full - backs frequently push forward to widen the offensive width. They combine dribbling in from the flanks with crosses from the by - line to launch attacks. In the front - line, tall players compete for set - piece headers. Corner kicks and free - kicks in the attacking third are their main goal - scoring methods. Once they lose the ball, Gomel quickly tries to regain possession on the spot. Their defensive line stands relatively high. However, when the full - backs push forward, there are gaps left behind them for opponents to exploit. The center - backs lack the speed to backtrack and make up for these gaps. During long periods of ball - possession, GomelO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
-
rewat.32@OfficiaIn this Belarusian Premier League encounter, the offensive efficiency presents a clear contrast between the two teams. Gomel has been struggling with a low offensive efficiency. Their conversion rate at the end of attacks stands at a mere 10%, and their xG efficiency is 0.8. On the other hand, Liepaja is in a better position, with a conversion rate of 14% and an xG of 1.2. In terms of passing, Liepaja also outperforms Gomel. Their key - pass success rate is 74%, while Gomel's is only 64%. Liepaja's forward - field passes contribute significantly to the game. When it comes to midfield control, Liepaja takes the lead with a 44% ball - possession rate, allowing them to dominate the rhythm. They have a faster transition speed and can effectively suppress the opponent with quick counter - attacks. Looking at the running data, the whole Liepaja team runs 110 km and makes 40 high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage enables them to apply full - court pressure. Given these factors, LieO/UBLR D1
FC Gomel
1-1 Neman Grodno
BLR D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X