APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Sheikh HammadWon 11/11Follow93.8%Win Rate +68.6%ROI 18Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
2
Analysis VIP99Won 5/5Follow90.9%Win Rate +62.5%ROI 11Tips 1.84Avg Odds -
3
Lord SatoshiFollow87.5%Win Rate +52.3%ROI 10Tips 1.87Avg Odds -
4
RinoandiWon 9/11Follow81.8%Win Rate +55.4%ROI 11Tips 1.93Avg Odds -
5
Steven MarleyWon 13/17Follow79.3%Win Rate +34.4%ROI 29Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
6
ApoorvWon 7/8Follow78.6%Win Rate +36.6%ROI 28Tips 1.89Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
peter habakkukThe tactical differences between Lexington and New Mexico United are highlighted in the data comparison. Lexington has shown a stable performance at home this season. In six home games, they achieved 3 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses, with a win - rate of 50.0% and a goal difference of 10:6, indicating outstanding offensive and defensive efficiency. In their last six matches, they were in strong form, winning 4 and losing 2, scoring 15 goals and conceding 8, with a win - rate of 66.7%. Their attack was in full swing and the defense was solid, averaging 1.67 goals per game. On the contrary, New Mexico United has a significantly weaker performance away from home. In six away games, they only won 2, drew 1, and lost 3, with a win - rate of 28.6% and a goal difference of 3:6. Conceding as many as 6 goals, their defensive vulnerability has become a fatal weakness in away games. Although New Mexico United leads in overall points (21 points, ranked 8th), there is a sharp contrast between their awaO/U
USL CH
Lexington
1-4 New Mexico United
-
Gilbert JosephLexington predominantly employs a 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 fast - break formation. In the midfield, Molloy and Ferry are responsible for linking up and coordinating the plays. Epps shows great sharpness in breaking through on the flanks, while Gudrum in the front line is a reliable finisher. The team has no key players out due to injuries and has sufficient depth in its rotation. However, the full - backs are a bit slow in getting back after pushing forward, and there are vulnerabilities in the defensive line's coordinated defense. New Mexico United also operates under a 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 system. Harris poses a significant threat with his crosses from the flanks. Goalkeeper Sheeks has excellent shot - stopping ability. But the defensive line lacks proper positioning, and the away - game finishing efficiency of the front line is quite low. The substitute offensive players are also weak in seizing opportunities. Lexington has been on a roll, securing three consecutive league victories. In their last awAHUSL CH
Lexington
1-4 New Mexico United
-
Callme_Osama07 Won 4/5Lexington has recently shown a distinct offensive character in the USL Championship and US Open Cup. In their last 10 games, they achieved 5 wins, 2 draws, and 3 losses, with a win rate of 50%, a goal difference rate of 55.5%, and a big - goal rate as high as 66.6%, while the clean - sheet rate is only 30%. This data combination highlights the team's efficient output on the offensive end. Their average number of goals per game remains at a high level in the league. For example, in the US Open Cup, they thrashed Louisville FC 4 - 2, and in the USL Championship, they defeated Tampa Bay 4 - 1 away from home, fully unleashing their offensive firepower. However, the team's defensive vulnerability is also quite obvious. In 3 out of the last 10 games, they conceded more than 2 goals. This includes a 1 - 4 loss against Edmonton Elks and the defensive loopholes in a 3 - 1 victory over Monterey Bay, which reflects the concern of insufficient defensive stability.O/UUSL CH
Lexington
1-4 New Mexico United
USL CH
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X