APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> JJ BEDDINGS>

    CDSyC Cruz Azul VS Puebla

    Primera Division Liga MX
    Analysis More Tips
    CDSyC Cruz Azul
    CDSyC Cruz Azul
    Puebla
    Puebla
    Further Reading
    • Smile Kyels
      Smile Kyels
      Blue Cross has a dual - scoring approach. They use their forwards' height to compete for set - piece headers and have midfielders making late runs for long - range shots. At home, the team benefits from a passionate home crowd. The center - backs are excellent at lateral defensive cover. The moderate temperature in the morning helps players maintain good passing and receiving stability. However, the team has some weaknesses. During long - term positional attacks, the forward players' runs often overlap, leading to a sluggish offensive rhythm when facing a compact defense. The full - backs' forward charges leave large gaps behind them. After 70 minutes of continuous running, the players' physical strength declines significantly. Once the team gains a favorable position, they will voluntarily retreat to the flanks to strengthen the defense, avoiding an all - out forward push that could expose them to counter - attacks. In their home games, Blue Cross adopts a 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 progressive fr
      O/U
      MEX D1 CDSyC Cruz Azul - Puebla
    • Harry potter polar
      Harry potter polar
      Blue Cross shows a stronger overall state compared to Puebla. In terms of offensive efficiency, Blue Cross has an offensive conversion rate of 18.3%, significantly better than Puebla's 14.1%. The xG efficiency is 0.78 for Blue Cross, while Puebla only reaches 0.42. Regarding passing performance, the key - pass success rate of Blue Cross is 62%, higher than Puebla's 55%. The value of forward - field passes is 12.4 for Blue Cross and 9.8 for Puebla. In the midfield, Blue Cross holds a 61% control rate, leading the game. Their transition speed is 1.8 times per minute, faster than Puebla's. In terms of physical exertion, the total team running distance of Blue Cross is 112.3 km, with 43 high - intensity sprints. These figures are higher than Puebla's 108.4 km and 37 sprints. Based on these aspects, I'd give this recommendation a five - star rating. Blue Cross is in good form recently, having won 6 and drawn 4 in their last 10 games with no losses. Their performance in recent matches has be
      O/U
      MEX D1 CDSyC Cruz Azul - Puebla
    • MOST HATED GOONER
      MOST HATED GOONER
      In the historical matchups of the Mexican League, the encounters between Cruz Azul and Puebla have shown distinct characteristics in corner - kick statistics. Looking back at the past 10 meetings, Cruz Azul has a record of 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss against Puebla at home. Meanwhile, Puebla has only managed 2 draws and 4 losses on the road against Cruz Azul, without a single win. The corner - kick data is particularly telling. Puebla has consistently lagged behind in away - game corner kicks. In the past 10 matches, they've averaged a deficit of 5.4 corner kicks, with a maximum gap of 9. For example, on one occasion, Puebla had only 2 corner kicks in an away game while Cruz Azul got 11, a difference of 9. There were also gaps of 7 and 3 in other matches. This disparity is reflected in the offense - defense transitions. Puebla's offensive efficiency on the road is notably low. In the 4 losses, they've only scored 2 goals, while Cruz Azul has netted 10. Blue Cross is a traditional Mexic
      AH
      MEX D1 CDSyC Cruz Azul - Puebla
    More Tips
    • Thun has been in great form recently. Their offensive conversion rate has risen to 18.3%, higher than Dinamo Zagreb's 15.1%. The xG efficiency of Thun reaches 1.28, while that of Dinamo Zagreb is only 1.05, indicating that Thun poses a greater threat in attack. In terms of key passes, Thun's success rate is 62.4%, better than Dinamo Zagreb's 54.9%, and the value of their forward passes is 12.7% higher. In midfield control, Thun has 3.2 more interceptions per game on average and their transition speed has increased by 15%. They also cover a distance of 118.6km during the game and have 41 high - intensity sprints, showing better physical fitness. On the defensive end, Thun's tackle success rate is 71.4%, leading the way. They also have 8 more clearances, which means their defense is more stable. In terms of offensive efficiency, Thun's conversion rate of scoring opportunities is 21.7%, higher than Dinamo Zagreb's 17.3%. The total xG of Thun is 2.45, significantly higher than Dinamo Zagre
      O/U
      UEFA CL Thun - Dinamo Zagreb
    • Vikingur has been in good form recently. In terms of the offensive conversion rate, they have an edge over Maccabi Bnei Reineh Bishkek. Vikingur's offensive conversion rate stands at 18.7%, higher than Maccabi Bnei Reineh Bishkek's 14.2%. The xG efficiency values also show a clear advantage, with Vikingur at 1.32 compared to 0.95 for their opponents. The key passing success rate of Vikingur is 62%, leading Maccabi Bnei Reineh Bishkek's 49%. Their forward passes are also more valuable, reaching 3.8 times per 90 minutes. In midfield control, Vikingur performs better. They average 12.3 tackles per game, and their transition speed is 1.8 times per minute, superior to their opponents. In terms of physical performance, the total running distance of Vikingur is 112.4 kilometers, and they have 43 high - intensity sprints, both higher than Maccabi Bnei Reineh Bishkek's 104.6 kilometers and 31 times. Overall, Vikingur seems to be in a stronger position in various aspects of the game. Bellshaput'
      O/U
      UEFA CL Vikingur Reykjavik - Hapoel Beer Sheva
    • The Central University of Venezuela has been struggling in the attacking end recently. Their offensive conversion rate stands at just 12%, lower than Santos' 18%. Moreover, their average expected goals (xG) per game is 0.65, trailing behind Santos' 0.92. In terms of key passing, both teams have a success rate of less than 45%, and the total value of forward passes is only 12.3 times, indicating poor offensive organization efficiency. When it comes to midfield control, the Central University of Venezuela has a 58% ball - possession rate, but their passing success rate is only 68%. Santos, with a 52% possession, has a faster conversion speed, completing an effective offensive pass every 23 seconds on average. Both teams have a total running distance of over 110 kilometers and 32 high - intensity sprints. However, their scoring opportunity conversion rate is less than 24%, resulting in a continuous lack of offensive power. On the defensive side, the two teams have similar tackle statistic
      O/U
      CON CSA Universidad Central de Venezuela - Santos
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.