Viborg vs Odense BK Tips and Predictions O/U JJ BEDDINGS

Denmark Superliga

Analysis More Tips

Viborg

Odense BK

Further Reading

MTASHE Won 3/4

The new season of the Danish Super League kicks off with an exciting encounter. Viborg, the home team, had a mid - table finish last season. They mainly adopt a 4 - 3 - 3 formation, focusing on flanking attacks. Viborg shows strong resilience in tough home games. However, during the pre - season warm - up, their performance has been inconsistent. They are facing a setback with several first - team players out due to injuries. The stability of their defense in long - term confrontations is weak. They often rely on set - pieces and quick counter - attacks to score goals. On the other hand, Odense uses a 3 - 5 - 2 formation with two strikers upfront. The two leading scorers in the frontcourt shoulder a large part of the goal - scoring responsibilities. But in multiple high - intensity pre - season warm - up matches, they conceded a large number of goals. When playing away, Odense usually tightens their formation and plays conservatively. The long - distance travel takes a toll on their ph

O/U
DEN SASL Viborg - Odense BK
MarkZ

Viborg is in a strong position compared to Odense. In recent matches, Viborg's average shot - on - target rate stands at 18.3%, significantly higher than Odense's 14.1%. Their xG efficiency reaches 0.68, a 0.22 - point lead over their opponents. In the attacking third, Viborg's passing value is 4.7, while Odense only manages 3.2. The key passing success rate of Viborg is 17.4%, compared to Odense's 12.8%. In the midfield, Viborg makes 11.2 tackles per 90 minutes, 2.4 more than Odense. Their transition speed is also 1.8 seconds faster on average. As a team, Viborg's average running distance is 11.3 kilometers, with 14.6 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing Odense's 10.8 kilometers and 11.2 sprints respectively. On the defensive end, Viborg's performance is also superior, with 8.3 tackles, 12.1 interceptions, and 5.6 clearances per game. Both teams are eager to gain an edge in the first leg. The offensive and defensive battle focuses on the midfield passing lines, the gaps o

O/U
DEN SASL Viborg - Odense BK
Garis Tengah

Viborg, the home team, has an extremely entertaining playing style this season. They score an average of one goal per league game, with diverse offensive methods. They can convert goals stably through wing breakthroughs, midfield penetrations, and set - pieces. At home, backed by the enthusiastic support of the fans, they maintain a high - intensity pressing strategy. They won't slow down the offensive tempo just to hold on to the score. However, the team has a fatal weakness in defense. They concede an average of 1.9 goals per league game. The defenders lack the speed to cover and assist each other, often missing opponents during fast - counter attacks. In a previous league match, they suffered a 2 - 6 thrashing at the hands of Aarhus, with their defense completely collapsing in that single game. In the last ten games, over 60% of the matches have ended with a high number of goals. Their style of open - ended offense and defense has become the norm.

O/U
DEN SASL Viborg - Odense BK

48

More Tips

The offensive end conversion rate of Arad United is 12.3%, lower than Galati Iron's 15.8%. However, the xG efficiency difference reaches 0.39, indicating that Arad United has a more efficient attack. Galati Iron has a key pass success rate of 61%, better than Arad's 54%, and the value of its forward passes is 12.7% higher. In the midfield, Arad United leads with a 58% ball - possession rate, but its transition speed is 0.8 seconds slower. In terms of running distance, Galati Iron runs 1.2 kilometers more than Arad United. Although Galati Iron has 14 fewer high - intensity sprints, it distributes its physical energy more reasonably. I'm good at selecting matches with unique issues and rare data. Galati Steel has shown a comprehensive edge in defensive statistics, with 18 tackles, 14 interceptions, and 9 clearances. On the offensive end, their xG value of 0.72 is lower than Arad's 0.85. However, their conversion rate of scoring opportunities at 21% surpasses Arad's 16%. The expected goal

O/U
ROM D1 UTA Arad - FC Otelul Galati
Aalborg shows superiority in multiple aspects compared to Hillerød. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Aalborg's 18.3% surpasses Hillerød's 14.1%. The xG efficiency of 0.78 against 0.59 indicates a greater offensive threat from Aalborg. Regarding passing, Aalborg has a key - pass success rate of 62% while Hillerød's is 55%. The value of forward - field passes is 12.4 for Aalborg and 9.7 for Hillerød, suggesting that Aalborg has a clear edge in ball control. On the defensive end, Aalborg is more proactive. They made 14 midfield interceptions compared to Hillerød's 9, and 11 tackles against Hillerød's 7. In terms of physical performance, Aalborg covered 112.3 km in total running distance, while Hillerød only ran 108.6 km. Aalborg also had 42 high - intensity sprints, 7 more than Hillerød, showing better physical reserve. I'm good at selecting matches daily by analyzing unique problems and rare data. Aalborg has a clear edge in multiple offensive metrics. Their touch percentag

O/U
DEN D1 Aalborg - Hillerod Fodbold
Vikingur shows a significant edge in various aspects of the game compared to Keflavik. In the attacking end, Vikingur's conversion rate is 12% higher than that of Keflavik. Their xG efficiency reaches 0.82 per 90 minutes, surpassing Keflavik's 0.65. In terms of the value of forward passes, Vikingur leads by 18%, and they also maintain a 62% advantage in the success rate of key passes. In midfield control, Vikingur averages 14 tackles per game, and their transition speed is 1.2 seconds faster than the opponent. The whole team runs an average of 11.3 kilometers per game, with 23 more high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. I'm good at selecting matches with unique issues and rare data. Keflavík has significant weaknesses in its defensive statistics. The team averages only 9 interceptions per game, and its clearance efficiency is 15% lower than the league average. On the offensive end, the conversion rate of scoring opportunities is only 18%, which is lower than Ví

AH
ICE PR Vikingur Reykjavik - Keflavik

0 Comments

All

By Author

Add Comment

Post

Viborg VS Odense BK