APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> JJ BEDDINGS>

    Aalborg VS Hillerod Fodbold

    Danish 1st Division
    Analysis More Tips
    Aalborg
    Aalborg
    Hillerod Fodbold
    Hillerod Fodbold
    Further Reading
    • Yossi Medina
      Yossi Medina
      Aalborg's home form has been a key strength this season. With a clear goal of promotion to the top - flight, they've built a well - rounded offensive and defensive system. Their midfield orchestrates the game smoothly, and the connection between the flanks and the center of the attack is seamless. Their home ground is a fortress where their attacking firepower is truly unleashed. However, the consecutive games have taken a slight toll on their players' physical condition. On the other hand, Hillerød sits comfortably in the middle of the league table, with little pressure from either promotion or relegation battles. When playing away, they adopt a low - block, defensive - heavy strategy. They mainly rely on counter - attacks and set - pieces to find scoring opportunities. Their attacking options in positional play are limited, and their back - line often struggles to clear the ball under high - intensity pressing. The outcome of this match will largely depend on Aalborg's ability to br
      AH
      DEN D1 Aalborg - Hillerod Fodbold
    • ForFun.exe
      ForFun.exe
      Aalborg employs a high - pressing system. In the midfield, the two defensive midfielders have clear - cut responsibilities. They rely on short passes to organize attacks. The full - backs make timely forward runs according to the game rhythm to expand the space for wing play. The team frequently makes horizontal passes, forcing the opponent's defense to move laterally continuously, thus wearing down their physical strength. The forward pivot is responsible for competing for the ball at set - pieces, while midfielders make late runs to shoot from long range, creating two scoring methods. Aalborg has rich experience playing at home. The central defenders have smooth lateral coverages. However, the team has its weaknesses. During long - term positional attacks, the attacking runs in the front - court tend to repeat. When the full - backs push forward significantly, the spaces behind them are easily exploited by opponents. Moreover, the frequent sprints and back - and - forth runs lead to
      O/U
      DEN D1 Aalborg - Hillerod Fodbold
    • p90x
      p90x
      Aalborg has shown a strong performance at home in the Danish First Division. This season, their home win - rate is as high as 42.8%, with a draw rate of 28.5% and a loss rate of 28.5%. They've scored 12 goals and conceded 11 at home, resulting in a goal difference of +1. Their average home goals per game are 1.71, with an average of 3.5 corners and 1.7 yellow cards per game. These offensive and defensive statistics are quite remarkable. Looking at the overall situation, Aalborg has a 30% win - rate, 40% draw - rate, and 30% loss - rate. They've scored 14 goals and conceded 18, with a goal difference of -4. Their average goals per game are 1.4, indicating a good balance between offense and defense. On the other hand, Hillerød has a poor away record. Their away win - rate is only 20%, draw - rate 20%, and loss - rate a high 60%. They've scored just 3 goals and conceded 11 away from home, with a goal difference of -8. Their average away goals per game are 0.6, showing a low offensive eff
      O/U
      DEN D1 Aalborg - Hillerod Fodbold
    More Tips
    • The offensive end conversion rate of Arad United is 12.3%, lower than Galati Iron's 15.8%. However, the xG efficiency difference reaches 0.39, indicating that Arad United has a more efficient attack. Galati Iron has a key pass success rate of 61%, better than Arad's 54%, and the value of its forward passes is 12.7% higher. In the midfield, Arad United leads with a 58% ball - possession rate, but its transition speed is 0.8 seconds slower. In terms of running distance, Galati Iron runs 1.2 kilometers more than Arad United. Although Galati Iron has 14 fewer high - intensity sprints, it distributes its physical energy more reasonably. I'm good at selecting matches with unique issues and rare data. Galati Steel has shown a comprehensive edge in defensive statistics, with 18 tackles, 14 interceptions, and 9 clearances. On the offensive end, their xG value of 0.72 is lower than Arad's 0.85. However, their conversion rate of scoring opportunities at 21% surpasses Arad's 16%. The expected goal
      O/U
      ROM D1 UTA Arad - FC Otelul Galati
    • Viborg has been in good form recently. Their average shot - on - target rate per game is 18.3%, higher than Odense's 14.1%. Their xG efficiency reaches 0.68, leading Odense by 0.22. In terms of offensive passing, Viborg's forward - field passing value is 4.7, while Odense only has 3.2. The key passing success rate of Viborg is 17.4%, compared to Odense's 12.8%. In midfield, Viborg makes more interceptions, with 11.2 interceptions per 90 minutes, 2.4 more than Odense. Their transition speed is also 1.8 seconds faster on average. The whole team of Viborg shows better physical strength. Their average running distance per game is 11.3 kilometers, and they have 14.6 high - intensity sprints, both higher than Odense's 10.8 kilometers and 11.2 sprints. On the defensive end, Viborg is also superior. They have 8.3 tackles, 12.1 interceptions, and 5.6 clearances per game, all better than Odense. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Viborg has a 21.7% conversion rate, compared to Odense's 16.9%
      O/U
      DEN SASL Viborg - Odense BK
    • Vikingur shows a significant edge in various aspects of the game compared to Keflavik. In the attacking end, Vikingur's conversion rate is 12% higher than that of Keflavik. Their xG efficiency reaches 0.82 per 90 minutes, surpassing Keflavik's 0.65. In terms of the value of forward passes, Vikingur leads by 18%, and they also maintain a 62% advantage in the success rate of key passes. In midfield control, Vikingur averages 14 tackles per game, and their transition speed is 1.2 seconds faster than the opponent. The whole team runs an average of 11.3 kilometers per game, with 23 more high - intensity sprints, indicating better physical fitness. I'm good at selecting matches with unique issues and rare data. Keflavík has significant weaknesses in its defensive statistics. The team averages only 9 interceptions per game, and its clearance efficiency is 15% lower than the league average. On the offensive end, the conversion rate of scoring opportunities is only 18%, which is lower than Ví
      AH
      ICE PR Vikingur Reykjavik - Keflavik
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.