APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> JJ BEDDINGS>

    Spartak Moscow VS Rodina Moscow

    Russia Premier League
    Analysis More Tips
    Spartak Moscow
    Spartak Moscow
    Rodina Moscow
    Rodina Moscow
    Further Reading
    • TopG Vikash
      TopG Vikash
      Moscow Spartak has set an exemplary performance at home in the Russian Premier League. In 15 home games, they've achieved 10 wins, 3 draws, and 2 losses, boasting an impressive win rate of 66.7%. Their home offensive and defensive stats are also remarkable, scoring 26 goals while conceding 17, with a goal difference of 9. They've accumulated 33 points, ranking third among home teams in the league. The team's home defense is particularly solid. With an average of only 1.13 goals conceded per game, it's significantly lower than the 1.47 goals conceded per game on the road. This shows that their defensive system is highly efficient and reliable in the home environment. In their recent 6 matches, they've had 3 wins, 1 draw, and 2 losses, scoring 9 goals and conceding 7, with a win rate of 50%. Their offensive and defensive efficiency has reached a balance. As the 4th - ranked team in the league, the stability of Moscow Spartak at home is their core competitiveness in the fight for European
      O/U
      RUS PR Spartak Moscow - Rodina Moscow
    • Okiem Madridisty
      Okiem Madridisty
      Moscow Spartak shows a clear edge in various aspects compared to Rodina Moscow. In terms of offensive conversion rate, Moscow Spartak has an average of 22% per game this season, ranking third in the Russian Premier League. In contrast, Rodina Moscow only manages 15%, placing 12th. The xG efficiency of Moscow Spartak is 1.8, the fourth - best in the league, while Rodina Moscow's is just 1.2, ranking 14th. When it comes to key passing success rate, Moscow Spartak's 85% outperforms Rodina Moscow's 70%. The value of forward passes is also in Spartak's favor, with 0.45 compared to Rodina's 0.3. In midfield control, Moscow Spartak has an average ball - possession rate of 60% and 18 counter - attacks per game, ranking second in the league. Rodina Moscow, however, has only a 43% ball - possession rate and 9 counter - attacks. Regarding high - intensity running data, the whole Moscow Spartak team runs 1.4 km, ranking fifth in the league, and has 24 sprints, the third - highest in the league. Ro
      O/U
      RUS PR Spartak Moscow - Rodina Moscow
    • Runiverse Idle
      Runiverse Idle
      Moscow Spartak has had 4 wins, 4 draws, and 2 losses in their last 10 matches. Their defense has been out - of - sync recently, with numerous gaps. Rodina Moscow also has a record of 4 wins, 4 draws, and 2 losses in the last 10 games. Their form was mediocre at first, but they've shown significant improvement lately. Their home record is quite impressive, with 4 wins and 2 losses in 6 home games. Although Rodina Moscow's overall performance is a bit behind Moscow Spartak, in terms of team strength, Rodina Moscow holds an edge. Their home - ground goal - scoring ability is decent, and the away team, Moscow Spartak, also has a good goal - scoring record. Moscow Spartak has been performing well recently. Compared to their opponent, the gap is not huge, but they're just an average team. In terms of records, they're slightly inferior to Rodina Moscow, yet their defensive performance is also solid. This time, Moscow Spartak is going all - out for victory. The question remains: can they conti
      O/U
      RUS PR Spartak Moscow - Rodina Moscow
    More Tips
    • Voronеж Torch shows better performance in several key offensive aspects compared to Makhachkala. Its offensive conversion rate stands at 18.6%, much higher than Makhachkala's 12.3%. The xG efficiency of Voronеж Torch is 1.24, while Makhachkala only reaches 0.92. In terms of possession, Voronеж Torch has an edge. The value of its forward passes is 4.7, and the success rate of key passes is 62%, compared to Makhachkala's 3.2 and 48% respectively. Defensively, Voronеж Torch is also more efficient. The number of midfield interceptions is 14, far exceeding Makhachkala's 9. The number of tackles is 11, while Makhachkala only manages 6. In terms of physical fitness, Voronеж Torch has better reserves. The running distance of Voronеж Torch players is 118 km, compared to 112 km of Makhachkala. The number of high - intensity sprints of Voronеж Torch is 42, while Makhachkala only has 28. Overall, Voronеж Torch seems to have a comprehensive advantage in this match. Mahachkala's offe
      AH
      RUS PR Fakel - FK Makhachkala
    • In terms of offensive conversion rates, Athletico Paranaense has an 18.3% conversion rate, which is lower than Internacional's 22.1%. Internacional also has an xG efficiency of 1.28, outperforming Athletico Paranaense's 0.91. When it comes to key passes, Internacional leads with a 67% success rate. Their forward - field passing value stands at 12.4 times per 90 minutes, better than Athletico Paranaense's 9.8 times. In midfield control, Internacional averages 14.2 interceptions per game and has a transition speed of 1.8 seconds per possession, giving them an edge. The total team running distance of Internacional is 112.3 km, with 43 high - intensity sprints, both figures surpassing Athletico Paranaense's 107.6 km and 35 sprints. I'm good at daily selection with unique insights and rare data. Brazilian International shows remarkable defensive strength, with 18.4 tackles, 21.3 interceptions, and 9.7 clearances per 90 minutes, comprehensively outperforming their opponent in defensive stati
      AH
      BRA D1 Atletico Paranaense - Internacional RS
    • Juarez shows superiority in multiple aspects of the game. In terms of offensive finishing conversion rate, Juarez has a 22.1% rate, while Guadalajara's is 18.3%. The xG efficiency also favors Juarez, with 1.05 compared to Guadalajara's 0.78. Regarding passing, Juarez's key - pass success rate is 61%, much better than the home - team Guadalajara's 49%. The value of forward passes is 12.7 for Juarez and 9.3 for Guadalajara. In the midfield, Juarez controls the ball 62% of the time, while Guadalajara only has 38%. The conversion speed of Juarez is 1.8 times per minute, faster than the home team's 1.2. In terms of physical performance, Juarez runs 118 km in total and has 42 high - intensity sprints, while Guadalajara runs 109 km and has 31 high - intensity sprints. On the defensive end, Juarez has 18 tackles and 14 interceptions, while Guadalajara only has 12 tackles and 9 interceptions. The clearance data of both teams is the same. In attack, Juarez's shot - on - target rate is 31%, highe
      AH
      MEX D1 Chivas Guadalajara - FC Juarez
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.