APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
VIAMOND💎Won 6/6Follow88.2%Win Rate +65.2%ROI 18Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
2
Freeman55Won 10/11Follow84.6%Win Rate +51.2%ROI 13Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
3
Boruto Otsutsuki ⭐⭐⭐🏳️🌈Follow81.8%Win Rate +48.1%ROI 11Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
3
Cooper MwaangaFollow81.8%Win Rate +40.5%ROI 11Tips 1.86Avg Odds -
5
NyraFollow78.3%Win Rate +50.7%ROI 23Tips 1.92Avg Odds -
6
HamedFollow75%Win Rate +30.5%ROI 33Tips 1.90Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Jack PellegriniSouth Melbourne plays at home and is accustomed to using midfield passing combined with flank attacks to create offensive opportunities. The front - court players have good chemistry, constantly posing goal threats at home. The team has a stable offense, but there are certain weaknesses in the defense. When the opponents launch rapid vertical attacks, there are gaps in the defenders' coordinated defense and position - filling. After a high - pressing strategy, there is often space left behind. Adelaide United has a well - developed tactical system. The midfielders have good running coverage, and the wingers are excellent at breaking through. They are good at seizing transition opportunities to advance forward, and the strikers are capable of capitalizing on chances. However, when the team plays away, its defense is not without flaws, especially when facing continuous attacks from the flanks. The home team's front - court players have a relatively proficient cooperation. They can continO/U
AUS CUP
South Melbourne
2-1 Adelaide United
-
The Chelsea VerdictIn this match, South Melbourne has an edge in offensive conversion. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, better than Adelaide United's 12%. The xG efficiency of 0.74 to 0.42 also shows South Melbourne's offensive superiority. However, Adelaide United has its own strengths. Their key pass success rate is 65%, higher than South Melbourne's 52%. The value of their forward passes, at 1.83 compared to 1.35, indicates a more efficient passing game. In midfield control, Adelaide United outperforms South Melbourne. They average 11.2 tackles per game, more than South Melbourne's 8.4. Their transition speed is 1.7 times per minute, faster than South Melbourne's 0.9 times per minute. In terms of physical performance, Adelaide United covers 118 km in a game, more than South Melbourne's 109 km. They also record 54 high - intensity sprints, compared to South Melbourne's 39, which shows their physical fitness advantage. I can provide you with accurate analysis and recommendations for dailyAHAUS CUP
South Melbourne
2-1 Adelaide United
-
SUPERSATOSouth Melbourne is aware that going head - to - head with an A-League team with much greater strength would be self - defeating. So, in this game, they are likely to adopt a full - back defensive strategy, setting up a low - block, compact formation. They will voluntarily cede ball possession. By deploying a large number of players in the midfield, they aim to compress the passing and ball - control space of the opponents. Meanwhile, they'll look for goal - scoring opportunities through counter - attacks on the flanks and set - pieces. Moreover, South Melbourne's home performance this season has been abysmal. In 11 home games, they've only scored 11 goals, with an average of less than one goal per game. Their offensive options at home seem rather limited. This "defense - oriented" tactical approach fundamentally restricts the number of goals in this match. Adelaide United holds an absolute edge on paper, yet there are hidden risks that could limit the openness of the game. First, the tO/UAUS CUP
South Melbourne
2-1 Adelaide United
AUS CUP
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X