APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> amvn>

    Newcastle United VS Everton

    International Club Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Newcastle United
    Newcastle United 1
    3 Everton
    Everton
    I'm a professional analyst with a long - standing and stable track record of providing high - quality information. I've tailored a set of long - term and top - notch products for my loyal followers. When comparing the offensive efficiency of Newcastle United and Everton, there's a clear disparity. In the recent matches, Newcastle's offensive conversion rate stands at 12%, higher than Everton's 9%. However, both teams' actual goals fall short of their expected goals, with Newcastle having an xG average of 1.2 and Everton 0.9. In passing statistics, Newcastle shows better offensive organization. Their key pass success rate is 78%, superior to Everton's 70%. Also, Newcastle's value of forward passes is 1.4 times per game, outperforming Everton's 1.2 times per game. In midfield control, Newcastle has an edge. They're expected to hold 60% of the ball possession, and their average of 12 transition attacks per game is more threatening than Everton's 8 counter - attacks per game. Physical data also favors Newcastle. The whole Newcastle team runs 110 kilometers in a game and has 150 high - intensity sprints per game, while Everton runs 108.6 kilometers and has 130 high - intensity sprints. This indicates that Newcastle has a more positive attitude towards the game.
    Further Reading
    • KKKKPRAY
      KKKKPRAY
      This year, there have been frequent transfers in the top five European leagues, especially in the Premier League, where the comings and goings of players are truly dizzying. Amid these player movements, which teams will see an increase in strength and which will experience a decline? A number of Premier League teams' friendlies are taking place. I'll spend one or two days introducing their situations this season, letting you know my initial predictions. Let's first look at the friendly between Newcastle and Everton. Newcastle had a multi - front campaign last season, participating in the Champions League and the league, yet ended up empty - handed. They were knocked out in the round of 16 in the Champions League. So, they've made comprehensive reforms this season. On the other hand, Everton is a seasoned Premier League team. They finished ninth last year and have returned to their tough - as - nails form. They're no longer a team fighting for survival. What changes will happen to them
      AH
      INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton
    • Tayyab hafeez
      Tayyab hafeez
      Newcastle United boasts one of the best home atmospheres in the Premier League. St. James' Park has always been a nightmare for visiting teams. The club typically deploys a 4-3-3 pressing formation, relying on continuous passing in the midfield to mobilize the defense. Flank attacks and set-pieces are their reliable goal-scoring methods. However, the team has obvious issues. Several players in the defense are struggling with injuries, leading to a shortage of options for center - back rotation. When they go all - out with a high - press strategy, the full - backs' forward runs leave large gaps behind them, making them vulnerable to opponents' quick counter - attacks. In the previous season's encounter, Newcastle lost at home to Everton, so there's no absolute psychological dominance. As the new season progresses and the schedule gets busier, the starting players are facing consecutive games. Their physical condition will likely affect their performance in the second half. Under the man
      AH
      INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton
    • nafkah
      nafkah
      Newcastle United and Everton show distinct differences in offensive efficiency. Newcastle's attacking conversion rate in recent matches stands at 12% over the last few games, higher than Everton's 9%. However, both teams' actual goals are below their expected goals, with Newcastle having an xG average of 1.2 and Everton 0.9. In passing statistics, Newcastle outperforms Everton. Newcastle's key - pass success rate is 78%, while Everton's is 70%. Newcastle also has a higher value of forward passes, averaging 1.4 times per game compared to Everton's 1.2. This indicates that Newcastle has a stronger ability to organize attacks. In midfield control, Newcastle is expected to have a 60% ball - possession rate and execute an average of 12 counter - attacks per game, further highlighting their offensive dominance. Newcastle United and Everton show a clear gap in offensive efficiency. In recent performances, Newcastle's conversion rate in the last five games stands at 12%, higher than Everton's
      O/U
      INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton
    More Tips
    • I've been providing long - term and stable information, and this is a high - quality long - term product tailored for big players. In recent matches, New York City has a relatively poor offensive performance. Their offensive conversion rate is only 8.2%, much lower than Necaxa's 12.7%. Moreover, Necaxa has a 19% higher expected goals efficiency. In terms of key passes, Necaxa shows great superiority. Their key pass success rate reaches 78.4%, and the passing value in the front - field is 3.2 per 90 minutes. In contrast, New York City only has a 62.1% success rate and a value of 2.1. When it comes to midfield control, Necaxa's midfield pass success rate is 89.3%, and their transition speed is 18.7 meters per minute, faster than New York City's 14.3 meters. In terms of running statistics, Necaxa runs 112.4 kilometers in the whole game and has 147 high - intensity sprints, leading New York City which runs 104.8 kilometers and has 112 sprints. Overall, Necaxa seems to be in a better state
      AH
      NCAL Cup New York City FC - Necaxa
    • I've crafted a high - quality, long - term product tailored for big players. Blue Cross is playing at home, yet their offensive efficiency is rather low. In their last five games, their offensive conversion rate is only 8.2%. The expected goals (xG) per game stand at 0.91, significantly lower than the actual goals. On the other hand, Chicago Fire has an average offensive conversion rate of 14.7%, with an xG efficiency 35% higher. Their finishing ability in the front - court is more consistent. In terms of key pass success rate, Fire has an impressive 78.3%, while Blue Cross only manages 63.1%. This means Fire's front - court passes are 22% more valuable. Fire also excels in midfield ball control. They can change the pace smoothly, with a transition speed of 1.8 times per minute, better than Blue Cross's 1.2 times. This allows them to break through the opponent's defense effectively during fast - paced attacks.
      AH
      NCAL Cup CDSyC Cruz Azul - Chicago Fire
    • I'm a professional analyst with a long - term stable track record. I've tailored a high - quality long - term product for my followers. In this comparison, Santa Fe shows significant advantages over River Plate. Santa Fe's offensive finishing conversion rate is 18.3%, better than River Plate's 14.7%. The xG value of 1.24 for Santa Fe against 0.91 of River Plate reflects its offensive efficiency edge. The key pass success rate of Santa Fe is 62%, which is higher than River Plate's 55%. The value of forward passes for Santa Fe is 1.83, superior to River Plate's 1.42. In terms of midfield control, Santa Fe has a 58% possession rate compared to River Plate's 42%. The average transition speed of Santa Fe is 12.4 seconds, faster than River Plate's 15.1 seconds. The total team running distance of Santa Fe is 112.3 km, 3.7 km more than River Plate's 108.6 km. The number of high - intensity sprints is 23 for Santa Fe and 18 for River Plate, indicating Santa Fe's physical advantage. River Plate
      AH
      CON CSA Independiente Santa Fe - River Plate
    Nowgoal.net
    Telegram Facebook X
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.