APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> El Noko>

    Newcastle United VS Everton

    International Club Friendly
    Analysis More Tips
    Newcastle United
    Newcastle United 1
    3 Everton
    Everton
    Further Reading
    • Ibroxonia
      Ibroxonia
      The historical encounters between Newcastle United and Everton reveal distinct contrasts in tactical styles. In one home game, Newcastle United lost 2 - 3 to Everton. They led in corner kicks 7 - 2 but were 1 - 2 down at halftime. This showed that their defense slackened after taking a lead. In another home match, they suffered a 0 - 1 defeat with 12 - 3 corner kicks, indicating a lack of offensive efficiency. Everton's away performances have been quite volatile. In one away game, they thrashed the opponent 4 - 1 with 8 - 7 corner kicks, demonstrating extremely fast counter - attacking speed. In another, they won 3 - 0 with 5 - 2 corner kicks, showing a solid defense. However, in a goalless draw, they had 0 - 10 corner kicks, which reflected their offensive impotence. Historically, Newcastle United has had an advantage in corner kicks at home. For example, in past victories, they had a significant edge in corner - kick counts, like an 8 - 2 corner - kick result in a 1 - 0 win and a 6 -
      O/U
      INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton
    • Crypto BetMan
      Crypto BetMan
      Newcastle United has shown a more positive state recently compared to Everton. In terms of offensive efficiency, there is a clear gap between the two teams. Newcastle United's offensive conversion rate in the last five games is 12%, which is higher than Everton's 9%. However, their expected goals (xG) averages are 1.2 and 0.9 respectively, and both teams have failed to reach their expected goal - scoring numbers. Looking at the passing statistics, Newcastle United has a better performance. Their key passing success rate is 78%, while Everton's is only 70%. The value of Newcastle's forward - field passes is 1.4 times per game, suppressing Everton's 1.2 times per game, indicating that Newcastle has a stronger offensive organization ability. When it comes to midfield control, Newcastle is expected to have a 60% ball - possession rate and an average of 12 counter - attacks per game. This is more threatening than Everton's 8 counter - attacks per game. In terms of physical data, Newcastle U
      AH
      INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton
    • nafkah
      nafkah
      Newcastle United and Everton show distinct differences in offensive efficiency. Newcastle's attacking conversion rate in recent matches stands at 12% over the last few games, higher than Everton's 9%. However, both teams' actual goals are below their expected goals, with Newcastle having an xG average of 1.2 and Everton 0.9. In passing statistics, Newcastle outperforms Everton. Newcastle's key - pass success rate is 78%, while Everton's is 70%. Newcastle also has a higher value of forward passes, averaging 1.4 times per game compared to Everton's 1.2. This indicates that Newcastle has a stronger ability to organize attacks. In midfield control, Newcastle is expected to have a 60% ball - possession rate and execute an average of 12 counter - attacks per game, further highlighting their offensive dominance. Newcastle United and Everton show a clear gap in offensive efficiency. In recent performances, Newcastle's conversion rate in the last five games stands at 12%, higher than Everton's
      O/U
      INT CF Newcastle United 1-3 Everton
    More Tips
    • Both Chicago Fire and Vancouver Whitecaps have shown strong competitiveness in the MLS with a 60% win rate. However, the detailed data reveals significant differences in their tactical styles. Chicago Fire has scored 22 goals and conceded 14, with a goal difference of 8 and an average of 2.2 goals per game. Vancouver Whitecaps also has 22 goals, but only 10 conceded, resulting in a goal difference of 12. They also average 2.2 goals per game. This indicates that both teams have similar offensive firepower, but Vancouver Whitecaps has a more outstanding defensive efficiency. Vancouver Whitecaps concedes only 1.0 goal per game, while Chicago Fire concedes 1.4, which directly widens the goal - difference gap. In terms of home - away performance, Chicago Fire has a 50% win rate at home. They average 2.0 goals and 1.8 conceded per home game, with a goal difference of 3. This shows that they lack stability when playing at home, as their loss rate is also 50%. Vancouver Whitecaps have a 33.3%
      O/U
      MLS Chicago Fire - Vancouver Whitecaps
    • Klubi has shown remarkable strength in recent home games. In the Romanian League, they thrashed Voluntari and Arges 5 - 0 and 3 - 0 respectively at home. They took a 3 - 0 and 2 - 0 lead in the first half of these matches. The corner - kick statistics, 10 - 0 and 13 - 5, clearly demonstrate their superiority in offensive organization and game control. After a 3 - 0 home win over Arges in the Europa Conference League, Klubi also secured a 3 - 1 away victory against Rapid București in the Romanian League. Despite a 0 - 5 away loss to Tromsø in the Europa Conference League, their home record proves their dominance on home soil. On the other hand, Universitatea Cluj has had a relatively stable away form. After a 3 - 1 away defeat to Brann in the Europa Conference League and a 1 - 0 away loss to Sfântu Gheorghe in the Romanian League, they managed a 0 - 0 draw against Dynamo Kyiv in the Europa League. The 10 - 4 corner - kick statistics highlight the discipline of their defensive tactics
      O/U
      ROM D1 CFR Cluj Postp. Universitaea Cluj
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.