APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Terrace Theory>

    Rosenborg BK VS Viking

    Norway Eliteserien
    Analysis More Tips
    Rosenborg BK
    Rosenborg BK 2
    1 Viking
    Viking
    Further Reading
    • Andie Peci
      Andie Peci
      Rosenborg has shown a higher offensive conversion efficiency in recent matches. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 14.2%, surpassing Viking's 9.7%. The expected goals efficiency (xG/shot) of Rosenborg is 0.18, ranking among the top in the Norwegian Premier League. In passing, Rosenborg also outperforms Viking. The success rate of their key passes is 68.3%, and the front - court passing value index is 12.7, while Viking's are 61.1% and 9.4 respectively. Rosenborg has a remarkable midfield control, with a stable possession rate of 58%. They average 5.3 fast - breaks per game, 1.8 more than their opponents, indicating a faster transition speed. In terms of physical performance, Rosenborg covers a running distance of 112.4 kilometers, with 147 high - intensity sprints, far exceeding Viking's 104.1 kilometers and 118 sprints. Given these aspects, how should we interpret the outcome of this game? In terms of defensive performance, Rosenborg has a clear edge over Viking. Rosenborg aver
      AH
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK 2-1 Viking
    • The Chelsea Verdict
      The Chelsea Verdict
      Rosenborg has an edge in offensive conversion rate, standing at 18.3% compared to Viking's 15.1%. Their xG efficiency is also better, with 0.78 against Viking's 0.62. On the other hand, Viking leads in key pass success rate, achieving 62% while Rosenborg only manages 55%. However, in terms of the value of forward passes, Viking's 14.2 is marginally lower than Rosenborg's 12.6. In midfield control, Viking outperforms Rosenborg. They average 12.4 tackles and 9.1 interceptions per game, higher than Rosenborg's 9.8 and 7.3 respectively. In terms of physical performance, Viking has covered 118.3 kilometers in running distance and made 47 high - intensity sprints, both better than Rosenborg's 112.4 kilometers and 39 sprints. I recommend setting up notifications to get accurate analysis and recommendations for daily matches. Viking has shown a more solid performance on the defensive end. They have an average of 8.6 clearances per game, compared to Rosenborg's 6.3. Their tackle statistics are
      AH
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK 2-1 Viking
    • Adin Reports
      Adin Reports
      Rosenborg has been in a much better offensive form lately compared to Viking. Their offensive conversion rate per game stands at 18.3%, while Viking's is only 14.1%. The expected goals (xG) also show a clear gap, with Rosenborg at 2.1 and Viking at 1.3. In terms of key passes, Rosenborg has an 82% success rate, and the value of their front - field passes is 0.45, higher than Viking's 0.31. When it comes to midfield control, Rosenborg has an average ball - possession rate of 61%. They can launch counter - attacks 4.8 times per 90 minutes. Their players run a total of 112 km per game, more than Viking's 107 km, and complete 19 high - intensity sprints, compared to Viking's 15. All these aspects indicate Rosenborg's superiority over Viking in this encounter. Rosenborg shows a stronger defensive performance compared to Viking. In terms of defense, Rosenborg averages 14.3 tackles per game, while Viking has 11.2. Rosenborg also has 8.1 interceptions per game, outnumbering Viking's 6.4. And i
      O/U
      NOR D1 Rosenborg BK 2-1 Viking
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Nowgoal.net
    Telegram Facebook X
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.