APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> Pi314>

    Jeju SK FC VS FC Anyang

    K League 1
    Analysis More Tips
    Jeju SK FC
    Jeju SK FC 0
    0 FC Anyang
    FC Anyang
    Further Reading
    • Tamaro
      Tamaro
      Jeju SK is currently in the upper - middle position in the league this season. The team's core strength lies in physical fitness and running. They have a fast offensive - defensive transition rate, and their flanks have sufficient impact. The games they play are both highly watchable and competitive. In the last ten official matches, Jeju SK has achieved 5 wins, 4 draws and only 1 loss, maintaining an unbeaten record for a long time, which shows great stability on the pitch. At present, the team has no injuries or suspensions, and the main players in all three lines are complete. The tactical system has been well - refined, and the players have unified and stable execution. On their home ground, Jeju SK is extremely aggressive. They mainly adopt a 4 - 3 - 3 high - pressing system. Their front - line players have strong encirclement and pressing capabilities, and they are good at forcing the opponents to make mistakes when passing the ball from the backcourt and then converting these in
      AH
      KOR D1 Jeju SK FC 0-0 FC Anyang
    • MR SUPERPIDGE
      MR SUPERPIDGE
      Jeju SK has shown a certain level of resilience in their home games in the K League. In their last three home matches, they achieved 1 win, 1 draw, and 1 loss. Specifically, they defeated Pohang Steelers 2 - 1, drew 1 - 1 with Gangwon FC, and played out a 3 - 3 draw against Incheon United. Statistics indicate that Jeju SK averages 1.33 goals scored and 1.33 goals conceded per home game, showing a good balance between offense and defense. The corner - kick data is particularly remarkable. In their last three home matches, the corner - kick ratios were 4 - 7, 5 - 2, and 5 - 5 respectively, with an average of 5.67 corner kicks. This reflects their advantage in wing attacks and set - piece tactics. Notably, Jeju SK has a clear corner - kick advantage when facing defensive - oriented teams at home. For example, the 4 - 7 corner - kick ratio against Pohang Steelers demonstrates their ability to control the ball and dominate the game. FC An-yang has shown significant fluctuations in their rec
      O/U
      KOR D1 Jeju SK FC 0-0 FC Anyang
    • Erdem Bitik
      Erdem Bitik
      Looking at the recent form of the teams, Jeju SK has shown a decent performance in recent matches. In the last 10 games, Jeju SK has 3 wins, 5 draws and 2 losses. On the other hand, FC Anyang has 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses in the last 10 games. Their away - game performance is not as good as at home. In historical match - ups, the home team, Jeju SK, holds an advantage. Although the two teams have had a relatively equal record in recent encounters, Jeju SK has demonstrated great tenacity. They are good at engaging in long - drawn - out battles against other opponents. In recent games, Jeju SK has not only played well but also ensured a certain goal - scoring rate. They have withstood various tests, which indicates that their ability to handle pressure is stronger than that of FC Anyang. Moreover, the main players of Jeju SK will be on the field for this game. The question is, can Jeju SK continue to strive for victory in this showdown against FC Anyang? Looking at the recent form, Je
      AH
      KOR D1 Jeju SK FC 0-0 FC Anyang
    More Tips
    • KFUM Oslo has been in a state where their offensive performance shows both quantity and inefficiency. In their recent five matches, they averaged 12.3 offensive terminations per game, yet their conversion rate was only 11%. On the other hand, Lillestrøm has a much better offensive efficiency. Their offensive termination conversion rate of 15% ranks third in the Norwegian Premier League. In terms of key passes, the success rate of KFUM Oslo is 62%, which is significantly lower than Lillestrøm's 71%, and the difference in the value of forward passes is as high as 1.8. In midfield control, Lillestrøm holds a clear lead with a 61% possession rate and a transition speed of 12.4 meters per minute. In terms of physical exertion, the visiting team, Lillestrøm, runs a total of 118 km during the game and makes 23 high - intensity sprints, 4 more than the home team. Defensively, Lillestrøm outperforms KFUM Oslo across the board. They record 18 tackles, 14 interceptions, and 9 clearances. In
      AH
      NOR D1 KFUM Oslo - Lillestrom
    • Maryport has shown greater efficiency at the offensive end. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18%, outperforming Seinäjoki's 12%. The xG efficiency is 1.3, 0.5 higher than the opponent. In terms of the passing network, Maryport is more efficient. Their key - passing success rate is 42%, leading Seinäjoki's 30%. The value of forward passes is 1.8 compared to Seinäjoki's 0.9, posing a greater threat. In midfield control, Maryport also has the upper hand. They average 11 tackles and 8 interceptions per game, and their transition speed is 1.2 seconds on average, faster than Seinäjoki. The whole team of Maryport runs a total distance of 112 km and has 45 high - intensity sprints, indicating more abundant physical reserves. Overall, Maryport seems to have more advantages in this game, and their performance is worth looking forward to. Mariehamn shows greater resilience in their defensive system. They average 14 tackles, 10 interceptions, and 7 clearances per game. Their intercept
      AH
      FIN D1 IFK Mariehamn - SJK Seinajoen
    • Alavés holds an edge over Getafe in several key offensive metrics. Their attack conversion rate stands at 18.6%, compared to Getafe's 14.3%. The xG efficiency of Alavés is 1.21, while Getafe lags behind at 0.98. In terms of passing in the front - field, Alavés has a higher passing value (4.7) than Getafe's 3.2. The key passing success rate of Alavés is 62%, outperforming Getafe's 51%. In the midfield, Alavés shows more stability. They have a 58% ball - possession rate and a conversion speed of 8.2 times per 90 minutes. Looking at the whole - team performance, Alavés runs more. Their total running distance is 112 km, and the number of high - intensity sprints reaches 89 times, both higher than Getafe's figures. On the defensive end, Alavés is also more active. They have 14 tackles, 21 interceptions, and 18 clearances, while Getafe only manages 12 clearances. Overall, based on these statistics, Alavés seems to be in a better position in this encounter. I invite you to follow me a
      AH
      SPA D1 Alaves - Getafe
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.