APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> ICEKHID>

    FC Utrecht VS AZ Alkmaar

    Holland Eredivisie
    Analysis More Tips
    FC Utrecht
    FC Utrecht 1
    4 AZ Alkmaar
    AZ Alkmaar
    Further Reading
    • Alex Russell
      Alex Russell
      Utrecht will host AZ Alkmaar in a home game. This season, Utrecht's overall win rate stands at 40%, draw rate at 10%, and loss rate at 50%. They've scored 12 goals and conceded 12, resulting in a goal difference of 0. Their average goals per game are 1.2, with 3.6 average corner kicks and 0.8 average yellow cards. When playing at home, their win rate climbs to 50%. The team averages 1.5 goals per game, concedes 8 goals, and has a goal difference of 1. Their defensive performance is relatively stable. Moreover, the average of 3.6 corner kicks at home is higher than the league average, indicating the potential of their corner - kick tactics on the offensive end. Utrecht shows good discipline at home, with only 0.8 yellow cards per game on average. This helps reduce the risk of losing points due to fouls. However, their overall offensive efficiency lags behind the league average. Alkmaar has shown a more dominant competitive state. Their overall win rate is 50%, draw rate 40%, and loss ra
      O/U
      HOL D1 FC Utrecht 1-4 AZ Alkmaar
    • Andie Peci
      Andie Peci
      Utrecht has demonstrated a higher offensive finishing conversion rate (18.7% vs 14.2%) and expected goals efficiency (1.23 xG per shot vs 0.98) in recent matches. This indicates that their offense poses a greater threat. Although Alkmaar's key pass success rate reaches 72%, the value of their forward passes is 11.3% lower than that of Utrecht. This shows that the quality of their goal - creating opportunities is insufficient. Utrecht's midfield has a more compact ball - control rhythm. The ball - possession conversion speed reaches 4.2 times per minute, higher than their opponent's 3.4 times. This effectively compresses the reaction time of the opposing defense. Utrecht's total running distance in a game is 118.7 kilometers, and the number of high - intensity sprints is 156, both of which are about 8% higher than Alkmaar's. This reflects their stronger physical fitness and pressing ability. So, how should we interpret the outcome of this game? Utrecht shows remarkable defensive strengt
      AH
      HOL D1 FC Utrecht 1-4 AZ Alkmaar
    • MujeebUrRehman
      MujeebUrRehman
      I have 24 years of football analysis experience and am good at various types of leagues and cup competitions. I'm trustworthy. Utrecht's defensive - counterattack system is not operating efficiently. After taking the lead, their defense often shows a lack of concentration. They also lack targeted methods to restrict players with outstanding individual abilities. There are obvious loopholes in the connection between individual confrontation and overall defensive coordination in the defensive end. They have been put in a passive position many times due to negligence in local marking. Alkmaar's defensive - counterattack system has not been very effective. After taking the lead, their defense tends to lose concentration. They lack targeted measures to contain players with strong individual skills, and there are gaps between individual defending and overall coordination. On multiple occasions, their defense has been breached due to local marking errors. On the other hand, Utrecht has shown
      AH
      HOL D1 FC Utrecht 1-4 AZ Alkmaar
    More Tips
    • The current state of both teams and their tactical approaches are the focus in this round of the Eredivisie. Hague has shown strong performance this season, with a record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss. Their home - field form has been particularly impressive. In the last 5 home games, they've achieved 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 1.2 goals per game on average while conceding only 0.8 goals. This places them among the top in terms of offensive and defensive efficiency in the league. They rely on a ball - control strategy, with smooth midfield organization. Their main offensive method is through wing breakthroughs. However, the absence of their star striker Johnson due to injury has weakened their attacking power. The new signing, Miller, will have to shoulder more of the goal - scoring responsibility. On the other hand, Groningen's recent league record stands at 2 wins, 2 draws, and 1 loss. Their away - game performance has been mediocre. In their last 5 away matches, they've managed onl
      O/U
      HOL D1 ADO Den Haag - Groningen
    • In the head - to - head history between Fuchuan FC and Quanbei Modern, corner kick statistics are a key indicator to unveil tactical execution. In a previous match, Fuchuan FC played away against Quanbei Modern. They were tied 1 - 1 at half - time and eventually lost 2 - 3. However, they led in corner kicks with a 4 - 2 score, which shows their outstanding offensive organization ability on the road. When Fuchuan FC hosted Quanbei Modern, they were scoreless at half - time and ended up with a 0 - 0 draw. But they were at a significant disadvantage in corner kicks, with a 1 - 7 result, reflecting their lack of home - field offensive efficiency. In a Korea Cup encounter, Fuchuan FC lost 2 - 3 away to Quanbei Modern. They were tied 1 - 1 at half - time, yet won the corner kick battle 8 - 1, highlighting their strong flanking breakthrough ability. In another Korea Cup match, the two teams drew 0 - 0, and the corner kick data was not recorded. But considering the 2016 encounter, Fuchuan FC's
      AH
      KOR D1 Bucheon FC 1995 - Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors
    • Ulsan FC has shown significant fluctuations in their home games this season. In their last five home matches, the team has a record of 2 wins, 2 losses, and 1 draw. The results include a 0 - 2 home defeat to Pohang Steelers (0 - 0 at halftime, 1 - 3 in corner kicks), a 3 - 1 home victory over Anyang (0 - 0 at halftime, 2 - 1 in corner kicks), a 1 - 3 home loss to Seoul (0 - 2 at halftime, 8 - 3 in corner kicks), a narrow 1 - 2 home loss to Incheon United (1 - 1 at halftime, 2 - 2 in corner kicks), and a 2 - 2 home draw with Daejeon Citizen (2 - 1 at halftime, 6 - 3 in corner kicks). Ulsan's home offensive efficiency is relatively high, with an average of 1.8 goals per game. However, there are obvious flaws in their defense, conceding an average of 1.4 goals per game. Their defense completely collapsed especially when facing Pohang Steelers and Seoul. The corner - kick statistics show significant fluctuations. For example, when facing Seoul, a team got 8 corner kicks, indicating good ba
      O/U
      KOR D1 Ulsan HD FC - Gangwon FC
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.