APP
Mobile
    Hong Kong Odds
    • Decimal Odds
    • Hong Kong Odds
    • Indonesian Odds
    • American Odds
    • Malay Odds
    English
    • English
    • Vietnam
    • Thailand
    Football> Community> u cant ans>

    Burnley VS West Ham United

    England Championship
    Analysis More Tips
    Burnley
    Burnley
    West Ham United
    West Ham United
    Further Reading
    • Crypto BetMan
      Crypto BetMan
      Burnley's recent form in the EFL Championship has been dismal. This season, they've shown a poor performance, with a winless record of 0 wins, 5 draws, and 5 losses. They've scored 10 goals while conceding 18, resulting in a negative goal difference of -8. Their average of 1.0 goal per game on offense is lackluster and hardly poses a real threat to opponents. In terms of defense, Burnley has major problems. In their last ten matches, they've managed only 1 draw and suffered 9 defeats. They've conceded 18 goals, an average of 1.8 goals per game, placing them among the bottom in the league. The instability of their defense needs urgent attention. When it comes to corner kicks, Burnley averages 4.7 per game, slightly more than West Ham United's 4.09. However, their low offensive efficiency means this advantage in corner - kick numbers doesn't translate into actual goals. West Ham United will likely look to capitalize on Burnley's offensive and defensive woes in this encounter. With Burnle
      AH
      ENG LCH Burnley - West Ham United
    • TC
      TC
      Burnley's preseason preparations were a disaster. Throughout the friendly matches, the team failed to secure a single win. They faced opponents like Cincinnati, Real Salt Lake, Ajax, and Torino but couldn't defeat any of them. They only managed to draw with Columbus Crew and Espanyol. Even though some of these opponents were not as strong as Burnley, the team still didn't show the competitiveness it should have. In addition, in the first round of the EFL Cup against the relatively weaker Notts County, Burnley could only draw 1 - 1. They advanced to the next round only after a nerve - wracking penalty shoot - out. On the other hand, although West Ham was relegated last season, their summer preparations have been quite stable. In the entire preseason friendlies, West Ham had an unbeaten record of two wins and three draws. They thrashed Colchester United and Stevenage, and also performed well against strong teams like Rangers and Magdeburg. Both Burnley and West Ham were relegated from th
      AH
      ENG LCH Burnley - West Ham United
    • pepper4455
      pepper4455
      WEST HAM CAN GAIN AN EDGE AT TURF MOOR Burnley enters this Championship opener at Turf Moor with home advantage but unconvincing preparation form. They failed to win any pre-season friendlies, drew with Notts County, and only advanced via a penalty shootout. West Ham, conversely, has shown more positive signs under Nuno Espírito Santo. They remained unbeaten throughout their pre-season—winning 5-0 against Stevenage and drawing 0-0 with Rangers—before coming from behind to beat Portsmouth 3-1 in the Carabao Cup. The most notable factor is the head-to-head record. West Ham is unbeaten in their last eight meetings with Burnley, having won both matches last season. This trend gives the visitors a clear psychological advantage heading into Turf Moor. Burnley is dealing with personnel issues, missing Jordan Beyer and Josh Cullen, while Jaydon Banel is also unavailable. West Ham is without Tomas Soucek and Keiber Lamadrid, yet their squad depth remains superior. The market currently lean
      AH
      ENG LCH Burnley - West Ham United
    More Tips
    • I've conducted in - depth research on this football match. In the comparison between Lahti and KuPS, Lahti has an edge in offensive finishing conversion rate, standing at 18.3%, while KuPS only has 14.1%. However, in terms of the xG value, KuPS leads with 0.85, surpassing Lahti's 0.62. When it comes to key passing success rate, KuPS is ahead with 72% compared to Lahti's 65%. KuPS also shows a high - quality performance in front - court passing, with a value of 14.2 times per 90 minutes. In midfield control, KuPS is more dominant. They average 12.4 interceptions per game and have a faster transition speed of 1.8 seconds per time. In terms of physical performance, Lahti's running distance of 11.3 kilometers is slightly less than KuPS's 11.8 kilometers. Also, Lahti's high - intensity sprints number 17 times, fewer than KuPS's 21. Overall, both teams have their own advantages. Lahti is stronger in offensive finishing, but KuPS shows better performance in many aspects such as expected goals
      AH
      FIN D1 Lahti - KuPs
    • I've been meticulously researching football matches and here's my in - depth analysis. In the comparison between Kalmar and Hammarby, Kalmar shows a significant edge in multiple aspects. In terms of offensive efficiency, Kalmar's recent conversion rate in finishing attacks is as high as 18.3%, which is notably better than Hammarby's 14.1%. Their xG efficiency also leads by 0.24. When it comes to passing, Kalmar's success rate of key passes stands at 62%, outperforming Hammarby's 55%. The value of their forward passes is 12.7% higher. In midfield control, Kalmar has a strong presence. They average 11.2 tackles and 9.8 interceptions per game. Moreover, their transition speed is 1.8 seconds faster than their opponents. Looking at the running statistics, the entire Kalmar team runs an average of 11.3 kilometers per game, with 32 high - intensity sprints. In contrast, Hammarby only manages 10.8 kilometers and 24 high - intensity sprints. Overall, Kalmar seems to have a better chance in this
      AH
      SWE D1 Kalmar - Hammarby
    • I specialize in match analysis and offer super selections. In the Danish Super League encounter between Randers and Copenhagen, Copenhagen demonstrates superior offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 18.2%, better than Randers' 12.4%. The xG efficiency of Copenhagen is 1.32 per 90 minutes, leading Randers by 0.45. In terms of key passes, Copenhagen's success rate is 62% compared to Randers' 48%, with a 17% higher value of forward passes. Regarding midfield control, Copenhagen has an average of 14 interceptions per game, a 20% increase in transition speed, a running distance of 118 km, and 35% more high - intensity sprints. On the defensive end, they have 18 tackles, 22 interceptions, and also hold an edge in clearance statistics. Copenhagen's tactical system holds a significant edge. Their midfield pressure and rapid transitions effectively control the game's tempo. The running distance of 118km and a 35% increase in high - intensity sprints ensure the quality
      AH
      DEN SASL Randers FC - FC Copenhagen
    Comments
    All
    By Author
    Me
    Add Comment
    Post
    Copyright © 2026 Powered By Nowgoal All Rights Reserved.