APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Oscar El Monix〽️🐐
642
Articles
0
Like
1
Follower
52.6%
Win Rate
-6.4%
ROI
39
Tips
1.87
Avg Odds
Member Ranking
-
1
SPORT249Won 12/13Follow92.3%Win Rate +51.2%ROI 13Tips 1.62Avg Odds -
2
Bennyjoe18Won 9/10Follow90%Win Rate +38.7%ROI 10Tips 1.53Avg Odds -
3
ConstanceWon 16/18Follow88.9%Win Rate +33.8%ROI 18Tips 1.52Avg Odds -
4
KKKKPRAYFollow81.8%Win Rate +55.9%ROI 11Tips 1.97Avg Odds -
4
Obertan4lifeWon 4/4Follow81.8%Win Rate +32.3%ROI 11Tips 1.59Avg Odds -
6
Duff ManWon 4/4Follow80%Win Rate +57.9%ROI 15Tips 1.94Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Okiem MadridistyIn this Premier League encounter, the performance metrics of Nottingham Forest and Tottenham Hotspur offer valuable insights. Nottingham Forest has a relatively low offensive conversion rate this season, with an average of just 9.3%, which falls short of the Premier League average. Meanwhile, Tottenham has a better conversion rate of 12.1%, but their xG efficiency stands at only 1.42 times per game. In terms of passing, Nottingham Forest's key - pass success rate is 72%, ranking fifth from the bottom in the league. On the contrary, Tottenham's forward - field passing value of 0.89 times per pass creates greater threat. The lack of midfield control for Nottingham Forest results in a conversion - attack success rate of only 31%. Although Tottenham holds a 58% ball - possession rate, their high - intensity sprint distance has decreased by 12% compared to last season. Nottingham Forest's average running distance per game is 112 km, the third - lowest in the Premier League. Tottenham's 1.4O/U
ENG PR
Nottingham Forest
0-0
Tottenham Hotspur
-
u cant ansI've carefully studied the match. Here's my analysis. Nottingham Forest has recently shown a significant improvement in offensive efficiency. Their offensive conversion rate stands at 14.2%, higher than Tottenham Hotspur's 11.8%. In terms of expected goals efficiency (xG/attacking end), Nottingham Forest has a slight edge with a rate of 0.157. Although Tottenham Hotspur has a high - value passing in the front - field, their key passing success rate is only 68.3%, lower than Nottingham Forest's 73.1%. Nottingham Forest's midfield maintains a stable ball - control rhythm, completing an average of 12.4 effective passes per minute. Even under high pressure, their transition speed remains at 18.7 meters per second. In addition, the whole Nottingham Forest team has an average running distance of 112.3 kilometers and 147 high - intensity sprints, leading Tottenham Hotspur's 108.1 kilometers and 129 sprints. Nottingham Forest has shown a more systematic performance in defense. They average 8.9AHENG PR
Nottingham Forest
0-0
Tottenham Hotspur
-
Nikhil Kumar Won 6/7The current state of the two teams presents a fascinating contrast. Nottingham Forest, under the guidance of manager Glasner, typically deploys a 3 - 4 - 2 - 1 formation. The team is well - versed in space compression and rapid transitions. In the previous match against Liverpool, despite having a mere 31% ball possession, they managed to score two goals, highlighting their high - efficiency counter - attacking style. However, their recent home form has been disappointing, losing both of their home games this season. On a positive note, they hold a significant psychological edge in historical head - to - head encounters. On the other hand, Tottenham Hotspur, with De Zerbi at the helm, continues to use a 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 formation. The team enjoys an average ball possession rate of nearly 60%, but shockingly, their shot conversion rate stands at 0%. In the first two rounds, they conceded five goals, indicating a serious imbalance between attack and defense. The large number of new signingsO/UENG PR
Nottingham Forest
0-0
Tottenham Hotspur
48
ENG PR
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X