APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
rozayFollow100%Win Rate +54.9%ROI 10Tips 1.55Avg Odds -
2
ConstanceWon 17/20Follow85%Win Rate +27.7%ROI 20Tips 1.54Avg Odds -
3
88SOCCERWon 5/5Follow83.3%Win Rate +49.3%ROI 12Tips 1.81Avg Odds -
4
Only1TobiazWon 12/15Follow80%Win Rate +48.2%ROI 16Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
5
AnalysisFollow80%Win Rate +54.1%ROI 10Tips 1.94Avg Odds -
5
JJ LauFollow80%Win Rate +18.8%ROI 10Tips 1.53Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
ScoopSnaxChicago Fire has shown better offensive efficiency in their encounter with Toronto FC. Their offensive conversion rate is 22%, higher than Toronto's 18%. The xG efficiency stands at 1.2 for Chicago compared to Toronto's 0.9, indicating Chicago's ability to finish attacks effectively. In terms of passing, Chicago has a key - pass success rate of 82%. The value of their forward - field passes is higher, which creates real threats. In midfield control, Chicago holds a 52% possession rate and combines it with a fast transition speed. This allows them to effectively dictate the game's rhythm. Physically, Chicago has an edge as well. Their total distance covered in the game is 110 km, and they lead in the number of high - intensity sprints. This supports their continuous high - pressure pressing. Chicago Fire has been showing better offensive efficiency in their confrontation with Toronto FC. The offensive finishing conversion rate of Chicago Fire is 22%, higher than Toronto FC's 18%. The xGAH
MLS
Toronto FC
3-4
Chicago Fire
-
TEST Coin By Random GuyIn recent matches, the offensive efficiency of Chicago Fire has been more impressive. When facing Toronto FC, their offensive conversion rate stands at 22%, higher than Toronto's 18%. The xG efficiency is 1.2 compared to Toronto's 0.9, clearly showing their superior ability to finish attacks. Looking at the passing analysis, Chicago's key passing success rate is 82%. Their passes in the front - field carry more value, creating real threats to the opponent. In terms of midfield control, Chicago has a 52% ball - possession rate and combines it with a fast transition speed. This allows them to effectively dictate the game rhythm. Physically, Chicago also has an edge. Their total running distance in a game is 110 km, and they lead in the number of high - intensity sprints. This physical advantage supports their ability to maintain a high - pressure pressing strategy throughout the game. All these factors suggest that Chicago Fire may have a better chance of success in this encounter. ChicaAHMLS
Toronto FC
3-4
Chicago Fire
-
TekelBersihThe standings put significant pressure on both Toronto FC and Chicago Fire in this game. Toronto FC, currently sitting at 22nd in the league, has a record of 5 wins, 10 draws, and 7 losses this season. In home games, Toronto FC has managed 3 wins, 7 draws, and 2 losses. They've scored 23 goals and conceded 23 goals at home, averaging 1.92 goals for and against per home game. This shows that while they can find the back of the net, their defensive line has some issues to address. On the other hand, Chicago Fire, ranked 5th in the league, has a much stronger overall record of 11 wins, 4 draws, and 6 losses this season. In away games, they've achieved 4 wins, 4 draws, and 3 losses. They've scored 19 goals and conceded 17 goals on the road, with an average of 1.73 goals scored and 1.55 goals conceded per away game. Their defensive performance away from home is relatively solid, which could give them an edge in this match. Overall, considering the league standings and their respective perfoO/UMLS
Toronto FC
3-4
Chicago Fire
MLS
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X