APP
Mobile
Hong Kong Odds
- Decimal Odds
- Hong Kong Odds
- Indonesian Odds
- American Odds
- Malay Odds
English
- English
Vietnam
Thailand
Member Ranking
-
1
Decs🐐♒Won 5/5Follow84.6%Win Rate +43.5%ROI 14Tips 1.90Avg Odds -
2
rozayWon 16/20Follow83.3%Win Rate +31.3%ROI 24Tips 1.59Avg Odds -
3
Noah WillWon 13/16Follow81.3%Win Rate +39.5%ROI 17Tips 1.91Avg Odds -
4
Dirty Dirty DiamondWon 9/9Follow81.3%Win Rate +47.3%ROI 16Tips 1.89Avg Odds -
5
ThatMadridGuyFollow80%Win Rate +51.7%ROI 10Tips 1.88Avg Odds -
6
Marcelino Deryl ManongkoWon 13/13Follow77.4%Win Rate +34.1%ROI 35Tips 1.93Avg Odds
Note: Statistics base on data from last 7 or 30 days
More Ranking
Further Reading
-
Suyash. Won 11/17Alkmaar is in excellent form, sitting at the top of the league table with 15 points from 5 consecutive wins in the new season. The team's offensive firepower is impressive, with multiple players in the front - line contributing goals. In particular, Dahl is in great shape, constantly threatening the opponent's goal. Alkmaar's home - field advantage is significant. However, the team has some defensive players injured. Also, due to their participation in European competitions, the players may suffer from fatigue. There are occasional gaps in their defense when transitioning from attack to defense. On the other hand, Willem II has had a poor start to the season. With only 1 point from 4 games, they are deep in the relegation zone. The absence of their defensive core has led to huge defensive loopholes, resulting in a high average number of goals conceded per game. Nevertheless, their forward line still has some counter - attacking capabilities, as evidenced by their goal in the last roundO/U
HOL D1
AZ Alkmaar
1-1 Willem II
-
Sfiso_93Alkmaar shows superiority in multiple aspects compared to Willem II. In terms of offensive efficiency, Alkmaar has a better offensive finishing conversion rate of 18.3% and an xG efficiency of 1.24, while Willem II only has 12.7% and 0.92 respectively. Alkmaar also leads in terms of the value of forward passes, which is 14.6, and the successful key - passing rate of 62%. When it comes to midfield control, Alkmaar's passing success rate reaches 89%, and its transition speed is 1.8 times per minute, significantly outperforming Willem II. Moreover, Alkmaar's running distance of 118 km and high - intensity sprints of 32 times are more than those of its opponent. On the defensive end, Alkmaar's performance is more active. It has 15 tackles and 9 interceptions, and the number of clearances is as high as 11 times. In the offensive aspect, the conversion rate of scoring opportunities for Alkmaar is 33%, much higher than Willem II's 21%. The total xG value of 2.1 for Alkmaar also shows a clearO/UHOL D1
AZ Alkmaar
1-1 Willem II
-
Adin ReportsAlkmaar and Willem II have both shown high offensive efficiency recently. Their offensive conversion rates stand at 18.7% and 16.2% respectively, both higher than the league average. In terms of key pass success rates, both teams achieve 68%. However, Alkmaar has a front - field passing value coefficient of 1.32, higher than Willem II's 1.15, indicating stronger offensive organization ability. When it comes to midfield control, Alkmaar has an average of 15.3 offensive - defensive transitions per game, faster than Willem II's 12.1. Coupled with an average running distance of 112 km and 23 high - intensity sprints per game, Alkmaar has formed an effective pressing system. Although Willem II has 19 interceptions, its clearance success rate is only 54%, showing obvious weaknesses in the defensive end. Alkmaar has a more imposing defensive record. They average 21.4 tackles per game with a 67% success rate. Meanwhile, William II has a less stable defense, conceding an average of 14.3 goal -O/UHOL D1
AZ Alkmaar
1-1 Willem II
HOL D1
Comments
All
By Author
Me
Post
Telegram
Facebook
X